5 Questions Every CISO Should Ask Their Privacy Team (& 5 They Should Hear in Return)
Want to share this?
Too many organizations struggle to answer basic compliance questions. When it comes to AI privacy and regulatory risk, CISOs and privacy leaders are natural allies. CISOs manage the infrastructure that keeps AI data and sensitive information secure.
At the same time, privacy teams ensure that data is collected, used, and shared in compliance with evolving AI regulations and ethical standards.
But alignment doesn’t happen automatically; it starts with the right questions. Below are five questions every CISO should ask their privacy counterparts to strengthen AI compliance and reduce risk exposure.
On the other hand, we’ll cover five essential questions that privacy leaders should ask CISOs in return to support a strong AI governance model.
5 Questions CISOs Should Ask Privacy Teams
1. What regulations most affect our data and AI strategy?
Privacy leaders track the evolution of laws such as GDPR, CCPA, and the EU AI Act. CISOs need to know which AI regulations directly impact how AI data must be collected, processed, and secured. Asking this ensures security priorities remain tied to the broader AI privacy framework.
→ Related: AI Governance for CISOs
2. Do we have a defensible incident response process?
A good process isn’t just about response speed; it’s about repeatability and defensibility. Privacy teams should demonstrate how every decision during an incident is logged, consistent, and regulator-ready. This is key to meeting AI compliance requirements.
→ Related: Five Signals Compliance Leaders Can’t Ignore
3. Where are we most exposed to AI and automation risk?
As AI becomes embedded across business functions, CISOs should collaborate with privacy leaders to identify where AI systems touch personal data, amplify bias, or create governance gaps. This ensures AI risk management is treated like any other enterprise risk under a sound AI governance framework.
4. How do we make compliance scalable across jurisdictions?
With over 20 state privacy laws in the U.S. and global frameworks like the EU AI Act, piecemeal compliance will not suffice. CISOs should ask how privacy teams are building a principled, “apply once, comply globally” AI privacy framework that scales across regions and adapts to new AI regulations.
5. Do employees know how (and when) to raise concerns?
AI compliance isn’t only about technical controls—it’s also about people. CISOs should ensure privacy leaders are fostering a “see something, say something” culture where employees feel safe raising red flags about data misuse, ethical AI, or potential gaps in AI governance.
5 Questions Privacy Leaders Should Ask CISOs
Collaboration goes both ways. Just as CISOs need clarity from privacy, privacy leaders need visibility into security’s approach. These five questions help align security with AI privacy and AI data protection goals.
1. How are we monitoring for insider threats and AI data misuse?
Privacy depends on trust, but CISOs are best positioned to detect anomalies that signal improper access, data misuse, or insecure handling of AI data.
2. What visibility do we have into third-party and AI vendor risk?
Vendors, partners, and cloud providers often handle sensitive data and AI models. Privacy leaders should ask what monitoring, auditing, and contractual safeguards CISOs enforce to ensure AI compliance and trustworthiness.
3. How do we ensure encryption and security align with privacy goals?
Strong security isn’t always the same as AI privacy. CISOs should demonstrate how encryption, masking, and access controls support privacy principles such as minimization, fairness, and purpose limitation within an AI privacy framework.
4. What’s our plan for monitoring AI systems?
As privacy concerns about AI governance arise, CISOs should share how they’re monitoring for adversarial use, model drift, or misuse of AI across the enterprise. Strong AI governance requires ongoing oversight.
5. Do we have clear ownership where AI privacy and security overlap?
Blurry lines create blind spots. Privacy should clarify who owns what in joint areas, such as incident response, breach notification, or AI oversight. Clear RACI charts reduce confusion and ensure compliance under pressure.
Closing Thought
The strongest AI compliance programs don’t live in silos. When CISOs and privacy teams exchange these questions and act on the answers, they move from reactive firefighting to proactive, enterprise-wide risk management. Together, they can build resilient AI privacy frameworks that not only meet today’s AI regulations but also prepare for the evolving challenges of tomorrow’s AI governance landscape.