Want to share this?

CISOs are no strangers to frameworks. For years, their world has been shaped by SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, NIST CSF, and PCI DSS, each one demanding its own specific controls and audit readiness requirements.

Now, AI adoption is accelerating across the business, often faster than governance and security teams can keep up with. Each team has its own goals, motivations, and AI use cases, many of which may not align with company policy or regulatory expectations. 

The result? Risk is introduced without clear ownership. And when boards ask, “Do we have the right controls in place?” CISOs will be expected to answer.

But controls alone aren’t the whole story. Privacy teams establish policies, manage incident inventories, and set standards for defensibility. CISOs ensure those policies come to life by operationalizing controls. Together, they form the foundation of defensible AI governance.

Why AI Governance Lands in the CISO’s Lap

AI frameworks don’t arrive with neat checklists. Instead, they add to the growing patchwork security leaders already navigate.

That creates challenges:

  • Framework fatigue: Each new requirement feels like another layer on top of SOC 2, ISO, HIPAA, and PCI DSS.
  • Untracked adoption: AI systems are implemented across departments faster than controls can be put in place.
  • Defensibility pressure: Boards and regulators expect evidence that AI adoption is being managed consistently and effectively.

In short, privacy may own the rules, but CISOs own the controls.

Controls = The CISO’s Way In

AI frameworks are starting to emerge (like NIST’s AI Risk Management Framework or AI RMF), and they do provide guidance on principles and controls for responsible AI. However, unlike long-standing standards such as SOC 2 or PCI DSS, these frameworks aren’t yet universally enforced or backed by regulators.

That creates challenges for CISOs:

  1. Framework fatigue: Instead of one clear rulebook, CISOs are left to interpret and align multiple overlapping frameworks alongside existing ones like ISO, HIPAA, and NIST CSF.
  2. Untracked adoption: AI systems are still being rolled out across departments faster than governance can keep up.
  3. Defensibility pressure: Boards and regulators are already asking for evidence that AI adoption is being managed consistently and responsibly.

In short, privacy may own the rules, but CISOs own the controls, and in the case of AI, those controls must be pieced together from a growing patchwork of frameworks and obligations.

Beyond Compliance: A Chance to Lead

Too often, Security is painted as the “department of no.” AI changes that.

With visibility and defensibility in place, CISOs can enable AI innovation safely, ensuring product, marketing, and HR teams can adopt AI without unchecked risk.

AI governance isn’t just about checking another box. For CISOs, it’s a chance to:

  • Streamline control mapping and coverage analysis into one defensibility view.
  • Partner with Privacy and Legal for unified coverage.
  • Position Security as a business enabler, not a blocker.

How to Get Started

The first step isn’t rewriting policies or chasing every framework. It’s simpler than that:

  1. Identify every AI system in use.
  2. Document what it does, what data it touches, and who owns it.
  3. Map risks against the frameworks you already use.
  4. Log defensible evidence that can be shared with compliance, legal, and the board.

From there, AI governance controls fall into place. Without inventory and defensibility, everything else is guesswork.

Final Word for CISOs

CISOs already juggle a long list of frameworks. The way to make that burden lighter is clear: visibility into what’s being used, defensibility in how it’s governed, and controls that work across the business.

Privacy teams set the rules and track incidents. CISOs put those rules into practice by enforcing controls and managing system inventory. Together, they create a stronger, unified compliance program.

Start with inventory. Build toward controls. Prove defensibility.
That’s how CISOs, working with privacy and compliance, can move from reacting to risks to leading AI adoption with confidence.