Why did we build this product?

The rise of AI regulations globally (EU AI Act, U.S. Executive Order, state-level laws) is creating urgent demand for organizations to identify and manage their AI-related risks. Our customers need a way to evaluate their AI systems and ensure compliance across jurisdictions, frameworks, and internal policies, while also ensuring a defensible audit trail. AI Risk is our response to that need.

What problem is AI Risk solving?

AI Risk provides a structured and defensible assessment process to identify and document risks tied to the use of AI systems. It supports organizations in evaluating regulatory exposure, applying consistent risk frameworks, and establishing AI governance across legal, privacy, security, and compliance teams.

Who will use this product?

AI Risk is intended for cross-functional teams that include Compliance, Legal, AI Governance, and Risk Management. AI Steering committees and their component members. AI steering committees and executives responsible for AI governance risk and compliance will find this especially valuable.

What makes this different from other AI governance tools?

Unlike general-purpose risk registers or generic GRC tools, AI Risk: Codifies regulatory guidance (e.g., EU AI Act, NIST RMF) into configurable assessments. Supports multi-framework alignment and documentation. Provides built-in auditability and traceability.

What are the top use cases?

Regulatory Alignment: Mapping AI systems to the EU AI Act or NIST AI RMF. Pre-Deployment Review: Assessing risk before releasing a model or tool. Cross-Functional Collaboration: Legal, compliance, and AI teams jointly evaluating risk. Audit Trail: Documenting decisions and rationale for audits and regulators.

Will this tie into incident workflows?

Yes. Incidents involving AI system misuse or harm can trigger assessments. Likewise, risk findings can link back into Compliance or Privacy obligations when thresholds are met.

Can I see reporting by risk level or framework coverage?

Yes. Assessments will support: Risk distribution by system | Framework coverage dashboards | Gaps or missing documentation

Can AI Risk handle multiple systems or models at once?

Yes. Assessments are per system/model but the interface will support a portfolio-level view.

Is this built to scale with new regulations?

Yes. New frameworks, jurisdictions, or internal review processes can be added via configuration. We plan to provide prebuilt updates for major regulatory shifts post-GA.

How does AI Risk integrate with existing AI governance software?

Radar AI Risk connects seamlessly with other AI governance tools, enabling centralized oversight without the need to replace existing systems.

Can AI Risk support high level reporting for executives and boards?

Yes. The platform offers high level dashboards and scorecards designed for leadership to quickly assess organizational AI risk posture.

How does AI Risk help with training data compliance?

AI Risk tracks and documents training data quality, provenance, and use, ensuring compliance with privacy and ethical guidelines.

Is Radar AI Risk suitable for organizations just beginning to adopt AI?

Absolutely. Whether you are starting small or scaling enterprise-wide, Radar AI Risk provides the structure to manage compliance from the beginning of development and deployment.

Search Results | RadarFirst

Privacy as a Growth Engine: Why Trust Now Drives Competitive Advantage

Discover how modern privacy management software enables teams to respond consistently, reduce risk, and build trust that fuels long-term growth.

Regulation S-P in Focus: Navigating the SEC’s New Data Privacy Rules (On Demand)

[…] the amended Regulation S-P, financial institutions face greater pressure to safeguard consumer data and strengthen breach-response capabilities. The new rules expand on the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, emphasizing transparency, privacy governance, and timely notification of data incidents. Join Christopher Hetner, former Senior Cybersecurity Advisor to two SEC Chairs, for a 45-minute discussion on how covered entities […]

How to Define Who Owns Privacy Risk: A Practical Framework for Privacy Management Leaders

As data moves faster across the enterprise, privacy ownership often becomes unclear. This guide offers a practical framework to define roles, strengthen governance, and support teams with the right privacy management tools.

The Privacy Patchwork: How to Build a Harmonized Approach When Laws Keep Changing

The privacy landscape isn’t slowing down; it’s accelerating. With new laws, cross-border enforcement, and AI governance evolving at record speed, privacy teams face a growing patchwork of rules. Learn how to replace reactive compliance with a harmonized privacy architecture powered by shared logic, automation, and real-time intelligence to build lasting organizational trust.

Design Thinking for Incident Response

Incident response isn’t just a process, it’s a human experience under pressure. Using design thinking, organizations can transform data and privacy incident management from reactive chaos into confident, consistent action. By building workflows that guide decisions, reduce interpretation, and automate incident response, teams improve speed, accuracy, and defensibility across every event.

AI Didn’t Reduce Privacy Risk. It Moved It Upstream

As AI reshapes decision-making, privacy risk no longer begins after an incident, it starts the moment someone uses a tool or model. Discover how proactive privacy risk management, AI governance, and modern privacy software for compliance officers can help organizations identify and govern risk earlier in the lifecycle.

Why ChatGPT Can’t Replace Regulatory Decision Systems and Why AI Governance Has Become a Leadership Imperative

As AI reshapes how enterprises work, leaders face a growing challenge: governance. ChatGPT can’t deliver the defensibility regulators demand. Discover how Radar Privacy™ and Radar AI Risk™ enable proactive, compliant, and traceable AI governance, helping compliance officers and privacy teams manage risk with confidence.

Regulation S-P in Focus: What Financial Institutions Must Do Now to Protect Consumer Financial Data

The SEC’s amendments to Regulation S-P reshape how financial institutions manage privacy, cybersecurity, and risk. This guide explains key compliance requirements, timelines, and action steps to modernize your financial risk management program and safeguard consumer data with effective financial privacy solutions.

2025 Legal Agreements

Legal Agreements & Terms Customer Agreements & User Terms for Products and Services Master Subscription Agreement Radar Privacy™ Software Schedule Radar Privacy™ Onboarding Overview How to Contact Us If you have any questions about these legal agreements and terms, RadarFirst can be contacted via email at [email protected], or you may send a letter to: […]

Radar Privacy™ Onboarding Overview

Legal Radar Privacy™ Onboarding Overview Onboarding Overview – Radar Privacy™ The Radar Privacy™ onboarding process is initiated after contract signing. You will be assigned a dedicated RadarFirst Onboarding Manager who will share best practices and guide your team through each phase described below. Before your Radar Privacy™ kickoff call, identify your core onboarding team […]

Radar Privacy Software Schedule

Legal Software Schedule – Radar Privacy™ Radar Privacy™. The “Radar Privacy™” product includes the following features: Single Sign-On Support (SAML 2.0) Multi-factor Authentication Full access to Radar data breach regulatory map and library Full access to Reports, Trends, and Benchmarking Application Program Interfaces (APIs) for integration Detailed Email Feature (DEF). “Detailed Email Feature” allows […]

ChatGPT vs. Radar Privacy™

Generic AI can’t ensure compliance. Radar Privacy™ delivers consistent, regulation-aligned breach response with automated risk scoring and defensible logic.

Beyond Compliance: Why Built-In Legal Intelligence Is the Key to Responsible AI

Many organizations complete every compliance task yet struggle to prove why decisions were made. This article explores how an integrated AI and privacy governance framework creates defensible, audit-ready processes by capturing rationale, ensuring consistency, and strengthening decision integrity.

Governing AI Responsibly: Managing Regulatory Risk Without Slowing Innovation

As AI adoption accelerates, innovation and regulation are colliding. From HR to finance, well-intentioned AI use can expose organizations to privacy and compliance risk. RadarFirst helps leaders govern AI responsibly by embedding regulatory guardrails into innovation, turning compliance into a catalyst for trust, transparency, and competitive edge.

Why General-Purpose AI (Even Custom-Built) Falls Short for Compliance

[…] risk framework. Where Custom GPTs Still Fall Short Even if a custom-built model includes compliance-like features, it rarely delivers the full package needed for defensibility and AI privacy compliance. 1. No Embedded Legal Oversight Compliance requires not just AI-generated reasoning, but expert legal review. A chatbot can generate plausible outputs, but only a legal […]