Why did we build this product?

The rise of AI regulations globally (EU AI Act, U.S. Executive Order, state-level laws) is creating urgent demand for organizations to identify and manage their AI-related risks. Our customers need a way to evaluate their AI systems and ensure compliance across jurisdictions, frameworks, and internal policies, while also ensuring a defensible audit trail. AI Risk is our response to that need.

What problem is AI Risk solving?

AI Risk provides a structured and defensible assessment process to identify and document risks tied to the use of AI systems. It supports organizations in evaluating regulatory exposure, applying consistent risk frameworks, and establishing AI governance across legal, privacy, security, and compliance teams.

Who will use this product?

AI Risk is intended for cross-functional teams that include Compliance, Legal, AI Governance, and Risk Management. AI Steering committees and their component members. AI steering committees and executives responsible for AI governance risk and compliance will find this especially valuable.

What makes this different from other AI governance tools?

Unlike general-purpose risk registers or generic GRC tools, AI Risk: Codifies regulatory guidance (e.g., EU AI Act, NIST RMF) into configurable assessments. Supports multi-framework alignment and documentation. Provides built-in auditability and traceability.

What are the top use cases?

Regulatory Alignment: Mapping AI systems to the EU AI Act or NIST AI RMF. Pre-Deployment Review: Assessing risk before releasing a model or tool. Cross-Functional Collaboration: Legal, compliance, and AI teams jointly evaluating risk. Audit Trail: Documenting decisions and rationale for audits and regulators.

Will this tie into incident workflows?

Yes. Incidents involving AI system misuse or harm can trigger assessments. Likewise, risk findings can link back into Compliance or Privacy obligations when thresholds are met.

Can I see reporting by risk level or framework coverage?

Yes. Assessments will support: Risk distribution by system | Framework coverage dashboards | Gaps or missing documentation

Can AI Risk handle multiple systems or models at once?

Yes. Assessments are per system/model but the interface will support a portfolio-level view.

Is this built to scale with new regulations?

Yes. New frameworks, jurisdictions, or internal review processes can be added via configuration. We plan to provide prebuilt updates for major regulatory shifts post-GA.

How does AI Risk integrate with existing AI governance software?

Radar AI Risk connects seamlessly with other AI governance tools, enabling centralized oversight without the need to replace existing systems.

Can AI Risk support high level reporting for executives and boards?

Yes. The platform offers high level dashboards and scorecards designed for leadership to quickly assess organizational AI risk posture.

How does AI Risk help with training data compliance?

AI Risk tracks and documents training data quality, provenance, and use, ensuring compliance with privacy and ethical guidelines.

Is Radar AI Risk suitable for organizations just beginning to adopt AI?

Absolutely. Whether you are starting small or scaling enterprise-wide, Radar AI Risk provides the structure to manage compliance from the beginning of development and deployment.

Search Results | RadarFirst

Privacy Statistics & Figures: Quantifying Incident Response at the ISACA Pittsburgh Information Security Conference

[…] and data breaches are integral to this goal. I look forward to continued research and thought leadership from ISACA, attendees of this event, and the privacy, security, compliance and risk professionals working in the field every day. Related Reading: Misconceptions in Incident Response Event, Incident or Breach? 2016 Trends in Data Breach Notification Law […]

Five Tips for Incident Response Readiness, from the IAPP 2016 Practical Privacy Series

[…] year. This is the cost of a single data breach, with additional losses associated with brand and reputational harm. In light of the real cost of non- compliance, making a relatively small investment in preventative measures, including staff hours, systems, and incident response preparedness tools, may well be worth the price tag. Under GDPR, […]

Trends in State Data Breach Notification Laws and Looking ahead to 2017

[…] continue and even pick up momentum in 2017. Prepare and Remain Aware At any given time, there are a number of active bills that could change what compliance looks like under state and federal data breach notification laws. Keeping up with these constantly changing regulations requires a good amount of work and attention to […]

Preparing for the GDPR: Start Now, Plan to Invest

[…] the trade of information and commerce across the Atlantic and the globe. The GDPR is pushing a sea-change in international privacy law as countries work to reduce compliance risk on transborder data transfers from the EU by rolling out legislation designed to be “adequate” under EU law. The sweeping legislation changes are accompanied by […]

Common Misconceptions in Incident Response

[…] here between a data incident and a data breach. Breaches are far less common than incidents when there is a strong culture of detection, risk mitigation and compliance. By analyzing incident metadata and looking across key industries that deal in regulated data, the analysis reveals a few insights where the common industry conceptions may […]

IoT, Infosec Trends, and International Privacy Law

[…] Security Forum for the first time. Organized by Daniel Solove and his TeachPrivacy organization, this informative event showcased the deep knowledge of the privacy, security, legal, and compliance speakers and attendees. Everyone at the forum exhibited an obvious passion for their work with their evident enthusiasm for learning and sharing knowledge. I was fortunate […]

Privacy and Security Together: A Risk-Based Approach to Incident Response Management

[…] industries in 82 countries. The data indicates that for every confirmed breach there are almost 98 more incidents that also require investigation and risk assessment to ensure compliance with federal and state data breach laws. A key point to keep in mind is that the report pertains to electronic incidents only, but paper incidents […]

What Security Detects, Privacy Assesses: Making Breach Determination a Team Effort

[…] breach laws and requires notice to affected individuals. Privacy Takes Over The security team provides valuable information about an incident that requires analysis by the privacy or compliance team. This analysis comes in the form of a multi-factor risk assessment, and requires such information as: The nature and severity of the incident; The type […]

Privacy and the Internet of Things: Everything Around You is Collecting Your Private Data

[…] of the design and architecture of their data flows in order to be compliant with privacy laws. France’s data protection authority (CNIL) has recently released a “ compliance package”, providing guidelines for how to treat the personal data gathered by connected cars. In a less formal setting this February, FTC Commissioner Terry Sweeney presented […]