Why did we build this product?

The rise of AI regulations globally (EU AI Act, U.S. Executive Order, state-level laws) is creating urgent demand for organizations to identify and manage their AI-related risks. Our customers need a way to evaluate their AI systems and ensure compliance across jurisdictions, frameworks, and internal policies, while also ensuring a defensible audit trail. AI Risk is our response to that need.

What problem is AI Risk solving?

AI Risk provides a structured and defensible assessment process to identify and document risks tied to the use of AI systems. It supports organizations in evaluating regulatory exposure, applying consistent risk frameworks, and establishing AI governance across legal, privacy, security, and compliance teams.

Who will use this product?

AI Risk is intended for cross-functional teams that include Compliance, Legal, AI Governance, and Risk Management. AI Steering committees and their component members. AI steering committees and executives responsible for AI governance risk and compliance will find this especially valuable.

What makes this different from other AI governance tools?

Unlike general-purpose risk registers or generic GRC tools, AI Risk: Codifies regulatory guidance (e.g., EU AI Act, NIST RMF) into configurable assessments. Supports multi-framework alignment and documentation. Provides built-in auditability and traceability.

What are the top use cases?

Regulatory Alignment: Mapping AI systems to the EU AI Act or NIST AI RMF. Pre-Deployment Review: Assessing risk before releasing a model or tool. Cross-Functional Collaboration: Legal, compliance, and AI teams jointly evaluating risk. Audit Trail: Documenting decisions and rationale for audits and regulators.

Will this tie into incident workflows?

Yes. Incidents involving AI system misuse or harm can trigger assessments. Likewise, risk findings can link back into Compliance or Privacy obligations when thresholds are met.

Can I see reporting by risk level or framework coverage?

Yes. Assessments will support: Risk distribution by system | Framework coverage dashboards | Gaps or missing documentation

Can AI Risk handle multiple systems or models at once?

Yes. Assessments are per system/model but the interface will support a portfolio-level view.

Is this built to scale with new regulations?

Yes. New frameworks, jurisdictions, or internal review processes can be added via configuration. We plan to provide prebuilt updates for major regulatory shifts post-GA.

How does AI Risk integrate with existing AI governance software?

Radar AI Risk connects seamlessly with other AI governance tools, enabling centralized oversight without the need to replace existing systems.

Can AI Risk support high level reporting for executives and boards?

Yes. The platform offers high level dashboards and scorecards designed for leadership to quickly assess organizational AI risk posture.

How does AI Risk help with training data compliance?

AI Risk tracks and documents training data quality, provenance, and use, ensuring compliance with privacy and ethical guidelines.

Is Radar AI Risk suitable for organizations just beginning to adopt AI?

Absolutely. Whether you are starting small or scaling enterprise-wide, Radar AI Risk provides the structure to manage compliance from the beginning of development and deployment.

Search Results | RadarFirst

Can’t-Miss Sessions at IAPP Privacy. Security. Risk. 2017

Privacy and security teams are often painted as adversaries in compliance. While it’s true that privacy, security, and risk professionals often come from different backgrounds and interests, they are united in their shared pursuit of compliance and events like the IAPP Privacy. Security. Risk. 2017 illustrate the way these fields are converging. The schedule for this annual […]

Alliance of Global Privacy Solutions Providers: Bringing Technology and Innovative Solutions to GDPR Compliance

[…] higher. Many questions about complying with the GDPR yet remain, including how to best approach the regulation, interpret the law, then plan, implement and manage a strong compliance program. In response to this very real pain experienced by privacy teams, a group of privacy management industry leaders have joined together to provide a suite […]

Lesson from the Equifax Breach: Readiness is Priceless

[…] notification delay but not an excuse. The fact is there are tools and processes available that not only accelerate and simplify breach response but also help ensure compliance with the intersecting maze of breach notification laws and contractual obligations. For example, the RADAR incident response management platform gives response teams instant access to 100% […]

Workflows and Checklists Can’t Match Automation in Privacy Incident Response

[…] determine whether an incident involving PII and/or PHI requires notification to regulatory bodies isn’t just a good practice for privacy programs–it’s a requirement for documenting and demonstrating compliance with data breach laws. Due to the misconception that any incident involving sensitive, regulated data is automatically a notifiable breach, it is critical that every incident […]

Surprising stats on third-party vendor risk and breach likelihood

[…] the series, we decided to look into an issue that is becoming more widely reported as companies react to recent large-scale data breaches and make preparations for compliance with the GDPR: managing risk of incidents caused by third-party vendors. The statistics on third-party breaches vary widely, and it’s clear that organizations have trust issues […]

Celebrating Our First Year as RADAR, Inc.

[…] this as a best practices industry brief. From these interviews emerged a few of my favorite sentiments to date on how RADAR helps ease the burden of compliance and breach notification: “We look at RADAR as a source of truth. In fact, when we get an incident, we say ‘Let’s run a RADAR on […]

Portland Business Journal: Data Breached? This Portland Company is Here to Help

[…] 2016, hitting an all-time high. And, if that wasn’t bad enough, today’s increasingly complex and rapidly changing privacy regulations are putting many companies at risk for non- compliance with federal, state, and even international data breach notification laws. Recently, I talked with Mahmood Sher-Jan, CEO at RADAR, Inc., about the genesis of his company and about […]

IAPP Matchup: The Philippines’ Data Privacy Act and the General Data Protection Regulation

[…] against the EU General Data Protection Regulation. The aim is to help determine how much duplication of operational effort you might avoid as you move toward GDPR compliance and help you focus your efforts. In this installment, RADAR Global Privacy Officer and Senior Counsel Alex Wall compares the Philippines’ Data Privacy Act of 2012, […]

Data protection is a team sport: Benchmark data tells the story

[…] data revealed that fewer than one in 10 incidents requires notice when a proper multi-factor and multi-jurisdictional assessment is performed, and that organizations with a strong culture of compliance will risk assess every incident. This key benchmark can be helpful in setting a standard to compare your organization’s internal metrics and establishing performance indicators moving […]

Assessing Ransomware Attacks and Shoring up Security Measures Under HIPAA

This article by Alex Speaks was originally published on the Compliance & Ethics Blog. Click here to view the original version of this article. Ransomware is a frightening and growing global threat. Last month, the largest known string of ransomware attacks hit globally, impacting dozens of countries around the world and disrupting systems critical to hospitals, telecommunications, […]

3 Common Misconceptions In Incident Response

[…] data incident and a data breach. Breaches are far less common than incidents when there is a strong culture of detection, consistent risk assessment, risk mitigation and compliance. Analyzing incident metadata and looking across key industries that deal in regulated data reveal a few insights where the common industry conceptions may be challenged. The […]

New York Department of Financial Services Cybersecurity Regulation Adds Breach Notification Obligation for Financial Institutions

[…] reading: New York Department of Financial Services Cybersecurity Rules Revised and Delayed, Hogan Lovells New York Department of Financial Services Revises Cybersecurity Proposal: Greater Flexibility and Delayed Compliance Deadlines, Proskauer Privacy Law Blog New York Revamps Proposed Cybersecurity Regulation for Financial Services and Insurance Entities, National Law Review If you’re a current RADAR customer, […]

Three Data Breach Developments to Watch: Increasingly Complex State and Federal Privacy Laws

[…] it comes to thinking about how data needs to be managed in rapidly evolving environments, privacy professionals are at the forefront. The thirty-minute webinar “Three Data Breach Compliance Developments to Watch in 2017” is now available to view on-demand. Major Takeaway: Overall Increased Stringency and Complexity As anyone in the privacy profession will […]

Reduce Risk and Simplify Compliance: Insurance CIO Outlook Top 10 Security System Solution Providers

[…] preserve business credibility and reduce financial damage. Helping insurance companies proactively mitigate these risks is RADAR, a patented SaaS-based incident response management platform that simplifies and streamlines compliance with federal and state data breach laws. “We are solving a valuable business problem by addressing the operational challenges the insurance providers face every day in […]

RADAR Named a Top 10 Security System Solution Provider by Insurance CIO Outlook

[…] is committed to being at the forefront of developing innovative incident response and decision-support solutions for the insurance sector and other highly regulated industries to help ensure compliance with complex and changing data breach laws. It is the only incident response management platform on the market that assesses, profiles, and scores data privacy and […]