Why did we build this product?

The rise of AI regulations globally (EU AI Act, U.S. Executive Order, state-level laws) is creating urgent demand for organizations to identify and manage their AI-related risks. Our customers need a way to evaluate their AI systems and ensure compliance across jurisdictions, frameworks, and internal policies, while also ensuring a defensible audit trail. AI Risk is our response to that need.

What problem is AI Risk solving?

AI Risk provides a structured and defensible assessment process to identify and document risks tied to the use of AI systems. It supports organizations in evaluating regulatory exposure, applying consistent risk frameworks, and establishing AI governance across legal, privacy, security, and compliance teams.

Who will use this product?

AI Risk is intended for cross-functional teams that include Compliance, Legal, AI Governance, and Risk Management. AI Steering committees and their component members. AI steering committees and executives responsible for AI governance risk and compliance will find this especially valuable.

What makes this different from other AI governance tools?

Unlike general-purpose risk registers or generic GRC tools, AI Risk: Codifies regulatory guidance (e.g., EU AI Act, NIST RMF) into configurable assessments. Supports multi-framework alignment and documentation. Provides built-in auditability and traceability.

What are the top use cases?

Regulatory Alignment: Mapping AI systems to the EU AI Act or NIST AI RMF. Pre-Deployment Review: Assessing risk before releasing a model or tool. Cross-Functional Collaboration: Legal, compliance, and AI teams jointly evaluating risk. Audit Trail: Documenting decisions and rationale for audits and regulators.

Will this tie into incident workflows?

Yes. Incidents involving AI system misuse or harm can trigger assessments. Likewise, risk findings can link back into Compliance or Privacy obligations when thresholds are met.

Can I see reporting by risk level or framework coverage?

Yes. Assessments will support: Risk distribution by system | Framework coverage dashboards | Gaps or missing documentation

Can AI Risk handle multiple systems or models at once?

Yes. Assessments are per system/model but the interface will support a portfolio-level view.

Is this built to scale with new regulations?

Yes. New frameworks, jurisdictions, or internal review processes can be added via configuration. We plan to provide prebuilt updates for major regulatory shifts post-GA.

How does AI Risk integrate with existing AI governance software?

Radar AI Risk connects seamlessly with other AI governance tools, enabling centralized oversight without the need to replace existing systems.

Can AI Risk support high level reporting for executives and boards?

Yes. The platform offers high level dashboards and scorecards designed for leadership to quickly assess organizational AI risk posture.

How does AI Risk help with training data compliance?

AI Risk tracks and documents training data quality, provenance, and use, ensuring compliance with privacy and ethical guidelines.

Is Radar AI Risk suitable for organizations just beginning to adopt AI?

Absolutely. Whether you are starting small or scaling enterprise-wide, Radar AI Risk provides the structure to manage compliance from the beginning of development and deployment.

Search Results | RadarFirst

Healthcare Privacy Concerns: Balancing Patient Care and Compliance

Last week during the regional Health Care Compliance Association (HCCA) conference in Nashville, I was lucky enough to host a gathering of executives from privacy and compliance for a private executive dinner with Adam Greene, an influential thought leader in privacy and partner with Davis Wright Tremaine. Adam moderated a robust discussion that explored […]

Amid a Flurry of Amendments and AG Guidance, the CCPA Deadline Looms Near

For better or for worse, the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) will finally go into effect on January 1, 2020,

The Pitfalls of Over-reporting Under the GDPR

[…] over 89,000 data breaches had been logged by EEA Supervisory Authorities. While the EDPB report casts a meteoric rise in reported breaches as positive evidence of increased privacy awareness, the plain truth is that many organizations are also over-reporting privacy-related incidents/breaches rather than face the risks of under-reporting. Maybe these organizations are thinking it’s […]

On Our Radar: November 15, 2019

[…] what risk the data may pose to individuals should it be disclosed in some way … basically, what do we qualify as data we must protect as privacy professionals? In the last few years, this topic has gotten more complicated. When the GDPR went into effect, the definition of personal data became considerably more […]

On Our Radar: November 8, 2019

Around the office, we talk a lot about how cyber attacks affect companies across many industries. We also often end up discussing the privacy industry itself. In a nutshell: it’s growing. And not just for the known players in the space. The industry is also seeing the introduction and proliferation of start ups and […]

5 Hot Topics from the PrivSec Conference in New York

Traditionally, privacy and security have been poles apart. We’ve seen an increased effort in the industry to align these two functions, especially as heavyweight regulations like GDPR and CCPA become effective. This week’s 2019 PrivSec Conference at Columbia University in New York seeks to further unite privacy and security with two days of inspiration […]

On Our Radar: November 1, 2019

How is it already November? Halloween is behind us, and thank goodness for that! Privacy professionals have more than enough to scare and trick us in our professional lives already–did you read my colleague Dorothy’s recent post about the rise in heart attacks following a ransomware data breach? So let’s focus instead on the […]

Evaluate Your Privacy Incident Response Program: Introducing New Quarterly Benchmarking Metrics

[…] cut. I bring this up, not because I want to broadcast my lifelong aspirations to play professional soccer, but as an example for something I see in privacy programs. When it comes to incident response management, there are no established rankings of who is doing well or who does poorly. Privacy professionals operate, in […]

On Our Radar: October 24, 2019

[…] gone by, and with it another news cycle filled with examples of recent data breaches, hacking attacks, and regulatory enforcements. Does it feel like our work as privacy professionals is enjoying a little too much of the limelight these days? You aren’t alone. Data breaches – and the required notification to affected individuals – […]

Built to Win: 5 Steps of a Proactive Incident Response Plan that Works

Privacy and security incidents involving sensitive personal data are as individual as fingerprints. An incident involving misplaced paper records is vastly different from a large-scale cyber-attack affecting millions of people. Yet the organization with the paper incident and the organization with the cyber-attack are both subject to a complex web of global data breach notification […]

Changing Data Breach Laws: The New York SHIELD Act

[…] to HHS under HIPAA. Notification Contents Specified: Individual notification contents are newly specified. Read the full text of the regulation here. What does this mean for privacy professionals? Under the new provision, a failure to report a breach under HIPAA could also lead to a failure to report to the New York Attorney […]

On Our Radar: October 11, 2019

It probably isn’t often that the world of privacy professionals is likened to a soap opera. However, if you really think about it, is the privacy world really all that far off from this genre of daytime television? The melodrama. The suspense. The evil twins! Ok, forget that last one. But there has been […]

Incident response ROI: Benchmarking data to secure budget, prove value

[…] initially can highlight results you may find risky and unacceptable. Ultimately it’s not really a question of whether it’s worth it to measure and invest in your privacy program, but rather a question of whether you can afford not to. You can’t change without a baseline and a benchmark for success. The ROI of […]

On Our Radar: October 4, 2019

[…] talk a lot about the different data breach notification laws proposed and enacted at a global level, and how that can contribute to a patchwork of complex privacy regulations that can leave privacy professionals scratching their heads. One of the trending regulatory changes we’re seeing in US states that will impact the insurance industry […]

The CISO’s Guide to Mitigating Enterprise Risk with Privacy by Design

[…] One of the most significant impacts on today’s CISOs, however, has nothing to do with mobile devices, malware, or the Internet of Things (IoT). Instead, expansive new privacy laws such as the European Union’s GDPR, California’s CCPA, and Canada’s PIPEDA often shape how a CISO sets priorities. Failure to comply with these laws poses […]