Why did we build this product?

The rise of AI regulations globally (EU AI Act, U.S. Executive Order, state-level laws) is creating urgent demand for organizations to identify and manage their AI-related risks. Our customers need a way to evaluate their AI systems and ensure compliance across jurisdictions, frameworks, and internal policies, while also ensuring a defensible audit trail. AI Risk is our response to that need.

What problem is AI Risk solving?

AI Risk provides a structured and defensible assessment process to identify and document risks tied to the use of AI systems. It supports organizations in evaluating regulatory exposure, applying consistent risk frameworks, and establishing AI governance across legal, privacy, security, and compliance teams.

Who will use this product?

AI Risk is intended for cross-functional teams that include Compliance, Legal, AI Governance, and Risk Management. AI Steering committees and their component members. AI steering committees and executives responsible for AI governance risk and compliance will find this especially valuable.

What makes this different from other AI governance tools?

Unlike general-purpose risk registers or generic GRC tools, AI Risk: Codifies regulatory guidance (e.g., EU AI Act, NIST RMF) into configurable assessments. Supports multi-framework alignment and documentation. Provides built-in auditability and traceability.

What are the top use cases?

Regulatory Alignment: Mapping AI systems to the EU AI Act or NIST AI RMF. Pre-Deployment Review: Assessing risk before releasing a model or tool. Cross-Functional Collaboration: Legal, compliance, and AI teams jointly evaluating risk. Audit Trail: Documenting decisions and rationale for audits and regulators.

Will this tie into incident workflows?

Yes. Incidents involving AI system misuse or harm can trigger assessments. Likewise, risk findings can link back into Compliance or Privacy obligations when thresholds are met.

Can I see reporting by risk level or framework coverage?

Yes. Assessments will support: Risk distribution by system | Framework coverage dashboards | Gaps or missing documentation

Can AI Risk handle multiple systems or models at once?

Yes. Assessments are per system/model but the interface will support a portfolio-level view.

Is this built to scale with new regulations?

Yes. New frameworks, jurisdictions, or internal review processes can be added via configuration. We plan to provide prebuilt updates for major regulatory shifts post-GA.

How does AI Risk integrate with existing AI governance software?

Radar AI Risk connects seamlessly with other AI governance tools, enabling centralized oversight without the need to replace existing systems.

Can AI Risk support high level reporting for executives and boards?

Yes. The platform offers high level dashboards and scorecards designed for leadership to quickly assess organizational AI risk posture.

How does AI Risk help with training data compliance?

AI Risk tracks and documents training data quality, provenance, and use, ensuring compliance with privacy and ethical guidelines.

Is Radar AI Risk suitable for organizations just beginning to adopt AI?

Absolutely. Whether you are starting small or scaling enterprise-wide, Radar AI Risk provides the structure to manage compliance from the beginning of development and deployment.

Search Results | RadarFirst

You Found a Compliance Gap. Now What?

[…] Found a Compliance Gap. Now What? Want to share this? The Gap Moment You’re preparing for an audit. Or responding to an RFP. Maybe you’re reviewing your privacy program or supporting a new certification. And then it happens: A control doesn’t map. A requirement went unmet. A jurisdiction wasn’t tracked. Out of view doesn’t […]

How Compliant Am I? The Most Important Compliance Question You Might Not Be Asking

[…] Controls™ How Compliant Am I? The Most Important Compliance Question You Might Not Be Asking Want to share this? Why This Question Matters More Than Ever Across privacy, cybersecurity, AI governance, and sector-specific regulations, one question continues to surface among compliance, risk, and security leaders: “How compliant are we, really?” It’s a simple question. […]

RadarFirst Launches Radar Controls™ | RadarFirst

[…] internal and external controls to regulatory and self-governance obligations, supporting structured compliance management, streamlined evidence generation, and efficient reporting across jurisdictions. “The question we hear most from privacy, compliance, and security teams is simple—but critical: What laws apply to us, and how can we demonstrate our compliance? In today’s regulatory climate, clarity and defensibility […]

Introducing Radar Controls™: AI-Powered Compliance Mapping for a Dynamic Regulatory Landscape

[…] Is This For? Radar Controls is purpose-built for organizations navigating regulatory complexity, especially those operating across jurisdictions or preparing for assessments. It’s ideal for: Compliance Program Managers Privacy, Risk, and Legal Teams InfoSec & Cybersecurity Leaders GRC Analysts and Audit Stakeholders Whether you use standard frameworks or custom-built controls, Radar Controls helps you align […]

Radar Controls™

[…] Uncertainty RadarFirst’s built-in AI strategist aligns control frameworks to global laws and regulations, delivering real-time visibility, line-by-line traceability, and defensible compliance at scale. Radar Controls empowers compliance, privacy, and risk leaders to navigate regulatory complexity with precision, speed, and accountability. Gain real-time answers, align global control frameworks, and close compliance gaps, so you can […]

AI Transparency Statement

[…] and internal stakeholders understand our rationale and safeguards. We believe that openly sharing this information builds and reinforces trust and accountability, aligning with our values of security, privacy, and ethical technology use. Model Identification Model: Anthropic’s Claude 4.0 Sonnet Provider: Accessed via AWS Bedrock Capabilities: Supports up to 200,000 tokens, enabling long-context reasoning and […]

Why Enterprises Choose Radar Privacy to Secure Their Data

Regulatory risk is rising and so are the expectations for privacy teams. In this FAQ-based guide, we explore why global enterprises choose Radar Privacy to power consistent, automated incident response. Discover how the platform helps mitigate risk, ensures compliance with evolving breach notification laws, and scales privacy programs across complex regulatory environments.

Radar Controls™, Compliance Coverage Quantified

Radar Controls maps internal and external controls to global compliance requirements, flags gaps in real time, and gives Legal, Risk, Security, and Privacy teams instant answers to “How compliant are we?”—all from one centralized cloud platform.

AI Risk Assessment: Managing EU AI Act Compliance

AI doesn’t rewrite your core legal obligations under current privacy laws, it turbocharges the speed, scale, and opacity of data handling.

EU’s New GPAI Guidelines: A Compliance Roadmap for August 2, 2025—and Beyond

[…] time-stamped. Beat the August 2, 2025 deadline Book a 15-minute demo to see how RadarFirst transforms AI governance into a continuous, automated process. Book a 15-minute Demo Privacy Incident Management | RadarFirst – this image contains a deep astral field full of distant stars and galaxies. RadarFirst blue sheens across the cosmos to evoke […]

How Radar Privacy Reduces Legal Costs up to 70%

When a data breach hits, every minute and dollar counts. This post contrasts manual, outside-counsel response with Radar Privacy’s automated workflow, showing how enterprises comply with global data-privacy laws, slash legal spend by 70 percent, and quantify gains instantly in our ROI calculator. Use the findings to secure executive buy-in and tighten regulatory risk management.

RadarFirst | AI Addendum

[…] or restrict AI functionality in accordance with emerging regulatory requirements or ethical guidelines. Users will be notified of material changes affecting AI system behavior. Data Use and Privacy Addendum for AI Data Use and Privacy in AI RadarFirst is committed to protecting the privacy, security, and integrity of your data in all aspects of […]

Radar AI Risk™

[…] governance maturity scoring. Use Case Fit What Generic AI is mainly used for chat, experimentation, or content generation. Why Why Radar AI Risk™: Tailored for AI governance, privacy risk, and regulatory classification. Legal Control What Generic AI poses risks to confidentiality and privilege. Why Why Radar AI Risk™: Secure, private, explainable outputs maintain legal […]

The EU AI Act: A Comprehensive Overview for Risk Management

[…] using AI, both inside and outside the EU. The EU AI Act adopts a risk-based approach, establishing requirements and expectations for specific uses of AI to protect privacy rights and promote the EU as a leader in AI development and governance. The EU AI Act affects organizations that develop, distribute, and deploy AI systems […]

The Executive Guide to Assessing AI Risk Management Solutions

[…] Executive Summary Artificial‑intelligence systems now shape credit decisions, medical diagnoses, hiring recommendations, and critical infrastructure operations. Regulators—from the EU AI Act to the FTC, FDIC, and state privacy laws—expect boards and executive risk committees to demonstrate ongoing risk management. Waiting for an incident is no longer a defensible approach. Chief Information Security Officers (CISOs) […]