Why did we build this product?

The rise of AI regulations globally (EU AI Act, U.S. Executive Order, state-level laws) is creating urgent demand for organizations to identify and manage their AI-related risks. Our customers need a way to evaluate their AI systems and ensure compliance across jurisdictions, frameworks, and internal policies, while also ensuring a defensible audit trail. AI Risk is our response to that need.

What problem is AI Risk solving?

AI Risk provides a structured and defensible assessment process to identify and document risks tied to the use of AI systems. It supports organizations in evaluating regulatory exposure, applying consistent risk frameworks, and establishing AI governance across legal, privacy, security, and compliance teams.

Who will use this product?

AI Risk is intended for cross-functional teams that include Compliance, Legal, AI Governance, and Risk Management. AI Steering committees and their component members. AI steering committees and executives responsible for AI governance risk and compliance will find this especially valuable.

What makes this different from other AI governance tools?

Unlike general-purpose risk registers or generic GRC tools, AI Risk: Codifies regulatory guidance (e.g., EU AI Act, NIST RMF) into configurable assessments. Supports multi-framework alignment and documentation. Provides built-in auditability and traceability.

What are the top use cases?

Regulatory Alignment: Mapping AI systems to the EU AI Act or NIST AI RMF. Pre-Deployment Review: Assessing risk before releasing a model or tool. Cross-Functional Collaboration: Legal, compliance, and AI teams jointly evaluating risk. Audit Trail: Documenting decisions and rationale for audits and regulators.

Will this tie into incident workflows?

Yes. Incidents involving AI system misuse or harm can trigger assessments. Likewise, risk findings can link back into Compliance or Privacy obligations when thresholds are met.

Can I see reporting by risk level or framework coverage?

Yes. Assessments will support: Risk distribution by system | Framework coverage dashboards | Gaps or missing documentation

Can AI Risk handle multiple systems or models at once?

Yes. Assessments are per system/model but the interface will support a portfolio-level view.

Is this built to scale with new regulations?

Yes. New frameworks, jurisdictions, or internal review processes can be added via configuration. We plan to provide prebuilt updates for major regulatory shifts post-GA.

How does AI Risk integrate with existing AI governance software?

Radar AI Risk connects seamlessly with other AI governance tools, enabling centralized oversight without the need to replace existing systems.

Can AI Risk support high level reporting for executives and boards?

Yes. The platform offers high level dashboards and scorecards designed for leadership to quickly assess organizational AI risk posture.

How does AI Risk help with training data compliance?

AI Risk tracks and documents training data quality, provenance, and use, ensuring compliance with privacy and ethical guidelines.

Is Radar AI Risk suitable for organizations just beginning to adopt AI?

Absolutely. Whether you are starting small or scaling enterprise-wide, Radar AI Risk provides the structure to manage compliance from the beginning of development and deployment.

Search Results | RadarFirst

The Missing Piece in Regulatory Risk Management

[…] a Strong Foundation. But the Most Crucial Workflows Are Still Missing. You’ve invested in platforms like ServiceNow to manage enterprise risk—but gaps remain where stakes are highest: privacy incident response. RadarFirst bridges the final mile of compliance. It transforms disconnected, manual processes into intelligent, automated workflows that scale effortlessly and deliver ROI—within the systems […]

The Missing Piece in Your Privacy Stack

Third-party data breaches are rising—and your organization could be next. Learn how to reduce risk, improve vendor oversight, and meet compliance deadlines using insights from the 2025 Privacy Incident Management Benchmarking Report.

Benchmarking Third-Party Privacy Risk

Swift breach response is critical in data privacy. Discover how Radar privacy helps reduce the average 31.6-day notification time with automated risk assessments and collaborative workflows—enhancing compliance and minimizing reputational damage.

2025 Benchmarking Report | Insurance Edition

Infographic 2025 Benchmarking Report | Insurance Edition Use this interactive infographic to benchmark and boost your incident response. Based on insights from the 2025 Privacy Benchmarking Report, this fill-in-the-blank worksheet helps you identify key performance gaps, set actionable KPIs, and visualize your path to faster, more compliant breach management. Download the Infographic Want to […]

2025 Benchmarking Report | Healthcare Edition

Infographic 2025 Benchmarking Report | Healthcare Edition Use this interactive infographic to benchmark and boost your incident response. Based on insights from the 2025 Privacy Benchmarking Report, this fill-in-the-blank worksheet helps you identify key performance gaps, set actionable KPIs, and visualize your path to faster, more compliant breach management. Download the Infographic Want to […]

2025 Benchmarking Report | Finance Edition

Infographic 2025 Benchmarking Report | Finance Edition Use this interactive infographic to benchmark and boost your incident response. Based on insights from the 2025 Privacy Benchmarking Report, this fill-in-the-blank worksheet helps you identify key performance gaps, set actionable KPIs, and visualize your path to faster, more compliant breach management. Download the Infographic Want to […]

Beyond the Firewall: The Risks of Third-Party Data Breaches

Third-party data breaches are rising—and your organization could be next. Learn how to reduce risk, improve vendor oversight, and meet compliance deadlines using insights from the 2025 Privacy Incident Management Benchmarking Report.

Breach Resolution Timelines

Swift breach response is critical in data privacy. Discover how Radar privacy helps reduce the average 31.6-day notification time with automated risk assessments and collaborative workflows—enhancing compliance and minimizing reputational damage.

Home – RadarFirst: Automating Intelligent Decisions

[…] Radar® Risk Management Platform replaces manual, subjective risk assessments with patented automation to guide your team to compliant reporting decisions. Simplify the complexities of AI risk requirements, privacy and security data breach laws, and third-party contractual obligations so your team can act swiftly and maintain compliance at scale. Proactive Compliance in a Changing Landscape […]

As Seen in Risk Future Magazine: Privacy Hero of 2026

As Seen in Risk Future Magazine Bank of America: Leading the Way in Privacy Event Management As a recognized leader in privacy event management and innovation, your next big win is already in motion: scalable, automated privacy incident response, powered by RadarFirst. Read the Report As Seen in Risk Future Magazine: Privacy Hero of […]

The Cost of Inaction: How Delayed Privacy Action Impacts Your Bottom Line

Join our expert panel to learn about the hidden costs of inaction and discover opportunities to generate ROI through privacy incident management.

AI Governance Starts with Why: A Strategic Guide for Policy-Driven Leaders

[…] Today The most effective AI policies aren’t the most complex — they’re the most aligned. Learn how RadarFirst supports strategic, audience-focused governance. Simplify AI Simplify AI Governance Privacy Incident Management | RadarFirst – this image contains a deep astral field full of distant stars and galaxies. RadarFirst blue sheens across the cosmos to evoke […]

Preparing and Facilitating Effective BCR Tabletop Exercises

[…] secret to their success lies not in rote compliance but in designing engaging, realistic experiences that leave a lasting imprint on both process and people. On The Privacy & Compliance Collective, Lauren Wallace, Chief Legal Officer at RadarFirst, and Paco Padilla Borallo, Cybersecurity and Privacy Council at Eaton, met to explore the art and […]

2025 Privacy Incident Management Benchmarking Report

The 2025 Privacy Incident Management Benchmarking Report reveals critical data every privacy and compliance leader needs to know.

Disaster Planning: Running Effective Cyber Event Tabletop Exercises

Hear from Francisco Padilla Borallo, Chief Privacy and Cybersecurity Counsel at Eaton, and Lauren Wallace, Chief Legal Officer at RadarFirst, on how to prepare and facilitate a successful BRC tabletop exercise.