Why did we build this product?

The rise of AI regulations globally (EU AI Act, U.S. Executive Order, state-level laws) is creating urgent demand for organizations to identify and manage their AI-related risks. Our customers need a way to evaluate their AI systems and ensure compliance across jurisdictions, frameworks, and internal policies, while also ensuring a defensible audit trail. AI Risk is our response to that need.

What problem is AI Risk solving?

AI Risk provides a structured and defensible assessment process to identify and document risks tied to the use of AI systems. It supports organizations in evaluating regulatory exposure, applying consistent risk frameworks, and establishing AI governance across legal, privacy, security, and compliance teams.

Who will use this product?

AI Risk is intended for cross-functional teams that include Compliance, Legal, AI Governance, and Risk Management. AI Steering committees and their component members. AI steering committees and executives responsible for AI governance risk and compliance will find this especially valuable.

What makes this different from other AI governance tools?

Unlike general-purpose risk registers or generic GRC tools, AI Risk: Codifies regulatory guidance (e.g., EU AI Act, NIST RMF) into configurable assessments. Supports multi-framework alignment and documentation. Provides built-in auditability and traceability.

What are the top use cases?

Regulatory Alignment: Mapping AI systems to the EU AI Act or NIST AI RMF. Pre-Deployment Review: Assessing risk before releasing a model or tool. Cross-Functional Collaboration: Legal, compliance, and AI teams jointly evaluating risk. Audit Trail: Documenting decisions and rationale for audits and regulators.

Will this tie into incident workflows?

Yes. Incidents involving AI system misuse or harm can trigger assessments. Likewise, risk findings can link back into Compliance or Privacy obligations when thresholds are met.

Can I see reporting by risk level or framework coverage?

Yes. Assessments will support: Risk distribution by system | Framework coverage dashboards | Gaps or missing documentation

Can AI Risk handle multiple systems or models at once?

Yes. Assessments are per system/model but the interface will support a portfolio-level view.

Is this built to scale with new regulations?

Yes. New frameworks, jurisdictions, or internal review processes can be added via configuration. We plan to provide prebuilt updates for major regulatory shifts post-GA.

How does AI Risk integrate with existing AI governance software?

Radar AI Risk connects seamlessly with other AI governance tools, enabling centralized oversight without the need to replace existing systems.

Can AI Risk support high level reporting for executives and boards?

Yes. The platform offers high level dashboards and scorecards designed for leadership to quickly assess organizational AI risk posture.

How does AI Risk help with training data compliance?

AI Risk tracks and documents training data quality, provenance, and use, ensuring compliance with privacy and ethical guidelines.

Search Results | RadarFirst

The Cost of Caution: How Overthinking Compliance Decisions Creates More Risk

[…] delay can lead to: Missed certification deadlines Inability to launch new products in certain markets Higher likelihood of audit findings or fines Loss of customer trust In finance, healthcare, and energy, your competitors aren’t waiting. In fact, some are marketing their compliance readiness as a selling point while you’re still “evaluating.” The Psychology of […]

The Hidden Friction in Buying Compliance Solutions And How to Remove It

[…] the cost of delay. How High-Performing Organizations Buy Differently The most effective enterprises we work with: Anchor procurement timelines to regulatory deadlines and product milestones Involve legal, finance, security, and budget leads early Align around urgency, not fear Use peer validation to accelerate buy-in Moving from Due Diligence to Due Speed Thorough evaluation is […]

Radar AI Risk™

[…] scaling enterprise-wide, Radar AI Risk provides the structure to manage compliance from the beginning of development and deployment. What industries benefit most from Radar AI Risk? Healthcare, finance, and insurance—industries with strict regulatory requirements—rely on Radar AI Risk to manage AI compliance risks effectively. Featured Resources IAPP AI and Privacy: Bridging the Gap Between […]

Solution brief for AI risk management software by RadarFirst

RadarFirst Unveils Radar AI Risk™ | RadarFirst

[…] said Zach Burnett, CEO of RadarFirst. “Radar AI Risk delivers continuous innovation, automation, and real-time insights so teams can confidently chart the course ahead.” Early adopters in finance, healthcare, and insurance report dramatic drops in manual errors and audit-prep time while unifying stakeholders around a single source of truth. Radar AI Risk is available […]

Search Our Content Library

Explore Insights by Keyword or Topic Search Our Content Library Explore More Resources Regulatory Trends 2025 Benchmarking Report | Finance Edition Regulatory Trends 2025 Benchmarking Report | Healthcare Edition Regulatory Trends 2025 Benchmarking Report | Insurance Edition 2025 Privacy Benchmarking Report | RadarFirst Privacy Incident Management | RadarFirst – this image contains a deep […]

2025 Privacy Benchmarking Report | RadarFirst

[…] OR (June 2nd, 2025) — RadarFirst, the leader in Regulatory Risk Management technology announces the release of the 2025 Privacy Incident Management Benchmarking Report, revealing how healthcare, finance, retail, and public sector organizations are navigating rising breach complexity and regulatory pressure. “This year’s data shows that teams investing in automation and defensible risk assessment […]

Benchmarking Third-Party Privacy Risk

[…] vendors are nearly twice as likely to require notification. That means every overlooked partner or software platform could put your compliance at risk. Whether you’re in healthcare, finance, or insurance, your vendors handle sensitive data. And when they slip up, you could be the one answering to regulators. Discover the latest insights from our […]

2025 Benchmarking Report | Finance Edition

Infographic 2025 Benchmarking Report | Finance Edition Use this interactive infographic to benchmark and boost your incident response. Based on insights from the 2025 Privacy Benchmarking Report, this fill-in-the-blank worksheet helps you identify key performance gaps, set actionable KPIs, and visualize your path to faster, more compliant breach management. Download the Infographic Want to […]

Home – RadarFirst: Automating Intelligent Decisions

[…] SEC | On Your Radar Podcast Cyber Radar® Compliance: A Configurable Assessment Engine Regulatory Trends RadarFirst Investigates | SEC Rules: Cyber Management Industry-Specific Compliance, One Powerful Platform Finance Healthcare Insurance Hospitality Retail Utilities and Energy Schedule a Demo We have received your request for a demo. A member of our team will be in […]

AI Governance Starts with Why: A Strategic Guide for Policy-Driven Leaders

[…] neither should governance. Start by mapping the stakeholders who touch, build, or are impacted by AI efforts. Internal productivity use cases often involve IT, operations, HR, and finance. Customer-facing applications bring in product, marketing, legal, and customer experience leaders. Wherever AI touches your business, governance must follow, and it must be co-created. Just as […]

6 Steps to Optimize Your Organization’s Risk Matrix

[…] list of applicable regulations and standards. This isn’t just about the “big names” like the SEC, DORA, and NIS2. Consider: Industry-specific regulations: Are you in healthcare (EMTALA), finance (CSIN), or another regulated sector? Geographic and Business scope: Where do you operate, and at what scale? EU regulations have extraterritorial reach, and state-level laws are […]

Responsible AI in Privacy & Compliance: How Transparency Builds Trust

[…] just expect assurances; they demand evidence. Privacy professionals working in heavily regulated industries know this feeling all too well. Regulations like GDPR, CCPA, and sector-specific rules in finance or healthcare require proof that your processes for handling personal information are consistent, repeatable, and transparent. But introducing AI often complicates this straightforward equation. AI-driven compliance […]

An empty conference room leaves space for incident response direction and accountability. Understanding Materiality in Cybersecurity and Compliance | RadarFirst

Understanding Materiality in Cybersecurity and Compliance

[…] evaluate it from an eight k perspective. And at that point, we bring in our more corporate attorneys, right, who are part of the disclosure. We’ve got finance involved at that point. Regular cybersecurity incidents, you’re not always gonna be reaching out to the finance team. But once we bring this eight k team […]

Navigating Materiality Determinations after a Cyber Event

Whether in finance, legal, compliance, or elsewhere, this session offers practical insights to create efficient, transparent processes that align with industry-specific obligations.

Navigating Materiality Determinations after a Cyber Event

[…] protocols, and outside counsel integration. We’ll also explore how to collaborate across departments, particularly when incidents involve sensitive data, and how to ensure consistent documentation. Whether in finance, legal, compliance, or elsewhere, this session offers practical insights to create efficient, transparent processes that align with industry-specific obligations. Speakers: Doug Kruger, VP of Strategic Accounts, […]