Why did we build this product?

The rise of AI regulations globally (EU AI Act, U.S. Executive Order, state-level laws) is creating urgent demand for organizations to identify and manage their AI-related risks. Our customers need a way to evaluate their AI systems and ensure compliance across jurisdictions, frameworks, and internal policies, while also ensuring a defensible audit trail. AI Risk is our response to that need.

What problem is AI Risk solving?

AI Risk provides a structured and defensible assessment process to identify and document risks tied to the use of AI systems. It supports organizations in evaluating regulatory exposure, applying consistent risk frameworks, and establishing AI governance across legal, privacy, security, and compliance teams.

Who will use this product?

AI Risk is intended for cross-functional teams that include Compliance, Legal, AI Governance, and Risk Management. AI Steering committees and their component members. AI steering committees and executives responsible for AI governance risk and compliance will find this especially valuable.

What makes this different from other AI governance tools?

Unlike general-purpose risk registers or generic GRC tools, AI Risk: Codifies regulatory guidance (e.g., EU AI Act, NIST RMF) into configurable assessments. Supports multi-framework alignment and documentation. Provides built-in auditability and traceability.

What are the top use cases?

Regulatory Alignment: Mapping AI systems to the EU AI Act or NIST AI RMF. Pre-Deployment Review: Assessing risk before releasing a model or tool. Cross-Functional Collaboration: Legal, compliance, and AI teams jointly evaluating risk. Audit Trail: Documenting decisions and rationale for audits and regulators.

Will this tie into incident workflows?

Yes. Incidents involving AI system misuse or harm can trigger assessments. Likewise, risk findings can link back into Compliance or Privacy obligations when thresholds are met.

Can I see reporting by risk level or framework coverage?

Yes. Assessments will support: Risk distribution by system | Framework coverage dashboards | Gaps or missing documentation

Can AI Risk handle multiple systems or models at once?

Yes. Assessments are per system/model but the interface will support a portfolio-level view.

Is this built to scale with new regulations?

Yes. New frameworks, jurisdictions, or internal review processes can be added via configuration. We plan to provide prebuilt updates for major regulatory shifts post-GA.

How does AI Risk integrate with existing AI governance software?

Radar AI Risk connects seamlessly with other AI governance tools, enabling centralized oversight without the need to replace existing systems.

Can AI Risk support high level reporting for executives and boards?

Yes. The platform offers high level dashboards and scorecards designed for leadership to quickly assess organizational AI risk posture.

How does AI Risk help with training data compliance?

AI Risk tracks and documents training data quality, provenance, and use, ensuring compliance with privacy and ethical guidelines.

Is Radar AI Risk suitable for organizations just beginning to adopt AI?

Absolutely. Whether you are starting small or scaling enterprise-wide, Radar AI Risk provides the structure to manage compliance from the beginning of development and deployment.

Search Results | RadarFirst

How to Slash Time Spent Addressing Contractual Obligations

In any serious privacy incident, regulatory compliance and victim notification are likely to be top of mind for privacy incident response teams. Avoiding regulatory penalties and loss of reputation are obviously core concerns. Yet contractual obligations can add hugely to the burden and costs of privacy incident response—an ongoing burden likely to increase as […]

Privacy Thoughts for Challenging Times

[…] many of us in the privacy world were looking forward to this year’s IAPP Data Protection Intensive (DPI) in London, IAPP Global Privacy Summit, and the HCCA Compliance Institute among others during a season of gatherings where we could share information and ideas about emerging data privacy issues. Fast forward to today, as we […]

CCPA vs. California Breach Notification Law: What’s the Difference?

[…] third issue dozens of trade associations recently raised is the operational impact from the coronavirus pandemic, which they fear will delay the ability to be in full compliance by July 1. They are asking California to delay enforcement until Jan. 2, 2021. Breach Notification Under the CCPA As the enforcement deadline approaches—be in July […]

How to Use 2020 to Improve Your Privacy Incident Response

[…] time. Given the breach presumption, every single incident requires a consistent, defensible and documented multifactor risk assessment to make the final notification determination and ensure proof of compliance. The burden of proof is on the organization to justify its decision, as well as document and demonstrate a consistent risk assessment that provides the required […]

Healthcare Privacy Concerns: Balancing Patient Care and Compliance

Last week during the regional Health Care Compliance Association (HCCA) conference in Nashville, I was lucky enough to host a gathering of executives from privacy and compliance for a private executive dinner with Adam Greene, an influential thought leader in privacy and partner with Davis Wright Tremaine. Adam moderated a robust discussion that explored […]

Amid a Flurry of Amendments and AG Guidance, the CCPA Deadline Looms Near

[…] how to meet the regulatory requirements of what some are calling “the beginning of ‘America’s GDPR.’” Last-minute amendments and late-issued guidance from the California Attorney General make compliance a real challenge, however. Is Seven the Lucky Number for CCPA Amendments? California Governor Gavin Newsom signed seven amendments to the CCPA into law on October […]

The Pitfalls of Over-reporting Under the GDPR

[…] be notifiable. But is racking up a long string of reported breaches really the cautious approach? What if a potential customer or business partner looks up your compliance record and sees a whole string of reported breaches? Will they want to do business with you? What if a competitor or someone in the media […]

On Our Radar: November 15, 2019

[…] blog post goes on to emphasize that you must have a lawful basis for processing this data, and you may consider an appropriate policy document outlining your compliance measures and retention policies regarding the data you process. When an incident occurs and privacy professionals perform a risk assessment to determine if it qualifies as […]

5 Hot Topics from the PrivSec Conference in New York

[…] long-anticipated California Consumer Privacy Act, which goes into effect on January 1st, 2020—a mere two months away. The threat of heavy fines and some unclear language make compliance a challenge. Learning from GDPR. This sweeping law is nearly 18 months old, and three back-to-back sessions are all about sharing lessons learned over the past […]

On Our Radar: November 1, 2019

[…] regulatory target. In the meantime, here’s a rundown of some common questions when it comes to your breach notification obligations under the CCPA. Next week is Corporate Compliance and Ethics Week, which aims to raise awareness of compliance and ethics within organizations, recognition of training opportunities, and reinforce leaders in establishing a strong culture […]

Evaluate Your Privacy Incident Response Program: Introducing New Quarterly Benchmarking Metrics

[…] yourself a question. Are these high-profile, high-risk threat vectors overshadowing the more routine but also very important everyday incidents occurring within your organization? A critical element of compliance is that each incident – big or small – requires a documented and consistent incident risk assessment and breach determination, especially when a decision is made […]

Built to Win: 5 Steps of a Proactive Incident Response Plan that Works

[…] allocating extra training resources to those employees. The ROI becomes clear, as company leaders see how a strong privacy program improves their overall company’s risk posture. Simplify Compliance with Automation Privacy automation provides the consistency and efficiency that regulators are looking for by operationalizing incident response. With this technology, organizations can: Simplify incident escalation […]

On Our Radar: October 11, 2019

[…] evolving global data breach notification laws and regulations so that, if passed, any new requirement is incorporated into the RADAR platform for automated risk scoring to ensure compliance on the law’s first day of enforcement. Breach Law Radar is a research tool that provides overviews of global data breach notification laws. Access this free […]

Incident response ROI: Benchmarking data to secure budget, prove value

[…] incident) to determine if the incident is a data breach requiring notification to individuals and/or regulatory bodies. Radar ensures that the incident metadata we analyze is in compliance with the Radar privacy statement, terms of use, and customer agreements. Sept 2019 Notification Rate IAPP Privacy Advisor Series-01 Sept 2019 Notification Rate IAPP Privacy Advisor […]

On Our Radar: October 4, 2019

[…] National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) Data Security Model Law (opens as PDF). The end result of this regulatory trend is additional complexity for data breach notification compliance in these states. Speaking of onerous data breach reporting requirements for the insurance industry, another challenge for privacy professionals in the field is the risk of […]