Why did we build this product?

The rise of AI regulations globally (EU AI Act, U.S. Executive Order, state-level laws) is creating urgent demand for organizations to identify and manage their AI-related risks. Our customers need a way to evaluate their AI systems and ensure compliance across jurisdictions, frameworks, and internal policies, while also ensuring a defensible audit trail. AI Risk is our response to that need.

What problem is AI Risk solving?

AI Risk provides a structured and defensible assessment process to identify and document risks tied to the use of AI systems. It supports organizations in evaluating regulatory exposure, applying consistent risk frameworks, and establishing AI governance across legal, privacy, security, and compliance teams.

Who will use this product?

AI Risk is intended for cross-functional teams that include Compliance, Legal, AI Governance, and Risk Management. AI Steering committees and their component members. AI steering committees and executives responsible for AI governance risk and compliance will find this especially valuable.

What makes this different from other AI governance tools?

Unlike general-purpose risk registers or generic GRC tools, AI Risk: Codifies regulatory guidance (e.g., EU AI Act, NIST RMF) into configurable assessments. Supports multi-framework alignment and documentation. Provides built-in auditability and traceability.

What are the top use cases?

Regulatory Alignment: Mapping AI systems to the EU AI Act or NIST AI RMF. Pre-Deployment Review: Assessing risk before releasing a model or tool. Cross-Functional Collaboration: Legal, compliance, and AI teams jointly evaluating risk. Audit Trail: Documenting decisions and rationale for audits and regulators.

Will this tie into incident workflows?

Yes. Incidents involving AI system misuse or harm can trigger assessments. Likewise, risk findings can link back into Compliance or Privacy obligations when thresholds are met.

Can I see reporting by risk level or framework coverage?

Yes. Assessments will support: Risk distribution by system | Framework coverage dashboards | Gaps or missing documentation

Can AI Risk handle multiple systems or models at once?

Yes. Assessments are per system/model but the interface will support a portfolio-level view.

Is this built to scale with new regulations?

Yes. New frameworks, jurisdictions, or internal review processes can be added via configuration. We plan to provide prebuilt updates for major regulatory shifts post-GA.

How does AI Risk integrate with existing AI governance software?

Radar AI Risk connects seamlessly with other AI governance tools, enabling centralized oversight without the need to replace existing systems.

Can AI Risk support high level reporting for executives and boards?

Yes. The platform offers high level dashboards and scorecards designed for leadership to quickly assess organizational AI risk posture.

How does AI Risk help with training data compliance?

AI Risk tracks and documents training data quality, provenance, and use, ensuring compliance with privacy and ethical guidelines.

Is Radar AI Risk suitable for organizations just beginning to adopt AI?

Absolutely. Whether you are starting small or scaling enterprise-wide, Radar AI Risk provides the structure to manage compliance from the beginning of development and deployment.

Search Results | RadarFirst

Privacy Regulatory Trends: The Data Mapping Imperative

Blog summary [5-minute read] A lawful and business purpose for collecting PI When data management = risk management Simplify compliance with data inventory Read more below. When the GDPR went into effect in 2018, there was concern about its data management requirements, and there was no doubt some concern when it became clear that […]

How to Use Privacy Metrics for Program Improvement and to Prove ROI

[…] regions across the globe. If there’s a region with an emerging privacy regulation, we may want to look at privacy efficiencies there to identify (and anticipate) any compliance gaps.” What purpose does each metric serve? Wraight highlighted three ways privacy professionals can use metrics to improve their programs: Inform a specific audience “Make sure […]

Regulatory Update: EU-U.S. Privacy Shield Invalid under Schrems II, 4 State Breach Notification Laws Take Effect

[…] the European Commission’s adequacy decision for the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework. This is the framework which more than 5,000 U.S. companies use to conduct trans-Atlantic trade in compliance with GDPR. Now these companies will need another way to legally enable transfers under EU data protection rules. (We’ll provide an in-depth analysis on Schrems II […]

Privacy Regulations Now: COVID, Civil Rights, and Compliance in Interesting Times

[…] CCPA despite the pandemic. When you add all that together, it’s an extremely difficult time for companies figuring out how to comply.” Fey recommends being strategic about compliance: “The rational approach is to understand where the greatest risks lie and prioritize how to address any gaps.” Blaney recommends that companies develop systems for tracking […]

RadarFirst Launches Inaugural Privacy Incident Benchmarking Report

First-of-its-kind report provides the privacy, compliance, and security community with privacy incident benchmark data to drive operational excellence.

Quantifying the Value of a Privacy Program: Education, Metrics, Relationships

[…] value of privacy programs. To learn how different leaders are approaching that effort, The Privacy Collective team talked to Rosemary Morgan, Chief Privacy Officer and Leader of Compliance Programs at Brighthouse Financial, and Patricia Thompson, AVP Compliance and Deputy Chief Compliance Officer at Pacific Life, in a recent virtual session entitled “Quantifying the Value […]

How to Tame the Chaos of Global Data Breach Notification Laws

When a privacy incident occurs, a company may have only hours to respond. Managing a timely response in compliance with global breach notification laws is never easy. These regulations quickly evolve and often conflict, creating a complex tangle that challenges privacy incident response teams at the best of times. Consistency and efficiency are key […]

Faster Time to Privacy Incident Decision: How to Accelerate Breach Notification Timeframes

[…] notification to individuals and/or regulatory bodies. It’s also important to note that this data represents incidents in the U.S., where these longer notification timeframes may be in compliance with the regulatory requirement. What are Common Factors of Data Breaches that Take Longer to Notify? In a previous benchmarking article, we examined a histogram displaying, […]

Preparing for the New Abnormal: Documenting HIPAA Compliance During COVID-19

[…] “How do we unwind them when this is all over?” The advice from both Chapman and Greene centered around consistency and documentation. Consistency Remains Key to HIPAA Compliance Chapman reported that post-COVID questions are very much on the minds of his management. “As my boss liked to remind us, at some point, we’ll have […]

To Streamline Workflow, Remote Privacy Teams Focus on the Fundamentals

[…] the amount of time one spends on those can be disproportionate to whether they actually move beyond the pilot phase or how important they really are to compliance. Giving good clear guidelines and having a process to evaluate something like a communication or a texting campaign—those types of fundamentals are much more important.” To […]

Privacy vs. Public Health: Compliance and Reporting During COVID-19

[…] ensure first responders will have greater access to real time infection information to help keep them and the public safe.” But if reporting COVID statistics raises HIPAA compliance questions, the prospect of releasing actual patient names and addresses raises even more. Adam Greene says he has fielded a number of questions from first responders […]

HIPAA Breach Notification Rule: A Baseline for Healthcare Incident Response in Uncertain Times

[…] HIPAA Breach Notification Rule requirements are an excellent standard for evaluating the effectiveness of your incident response plan now and after the crisis. Learn more in “ Compliance with the HIPAA Breach Notification Rule: Incident Response in an Uncertain World” A Refresher on the HIPAA Breach Notification Rule HIPAA requires that both covered entities […]

Privacy and the Remote Office in the Time of COVID-19

[…] of you online, and the vast majority said the transition is going pretty smoothly. We recently had a conversation with Kristi Harding, Senior Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer at Venerable, an emerging U.S. variable annuity business, to see how she and her team are dealing with the pandemic and new working conditions. Embrace […]

How to Slash Time Spent Addressing Contractual Obligations

In any serious privacy incident, regulatory compliance and victim notification are likely to be top of mind for privacy incident response teams. Avoiding regulatory penalties and loss of reputation are obviously core concerns. Yet contractual obligations can add hugely to the burden and costs of privacy incident response—an ongoing burden likely to increase as […]

Privacy Thoughts for Challenging Times

[…] many of us in the privacy world were looking forward to this year’s IAPP Data Protection Intensive (DPI) in London, IAPP Global Privacy Summit, and the HCCA Compliance Institute among others during a season of gatherings where we could share information and ideas about emerging data privacy issues. Fast forward to today, as we […]