Why did we build this product?

The rise of AI regulations globally (EU AI Act, U.S. Executive Order, state-level laws) is creating urgent demand for organizations to identify and manage their AI-related risks. Our customers need a way to evaluate their AI systems and ensure compliance across jurisdictions, frameworks, and internal policies, while also ensuring a defensible audit trail. AI Risk is our response to that need.

What problem is AI Risk solving?

AI Risk provides a structured and defensible assessment process to identify and document risks tied to the use of AI systems. It supports organizations in evaluating regulatory exposure, applying consistent risk frameworks, and establishing AI governance across legal, privacy, security, and compliance teams.

Who will use this product?

AI Risk is intended for cross-functional teams that include Compliance, Legal, AI Governance, and Risk Management. AI Steering committees and their component members. AI steering committees and executives responsible for AI governance risk and compliance will find this especially valuable.

What makes this different from other AI governance tools?

Unlike general-purpose risk registers or generic GRC tools, AI Risk: Codifies regulatory guidance (e.g., EU AI Act, NIST RMF) into configurable assessments. Supports multi-framework alignment and documentation. Provides built-in auditability and traceability.

What are the top use cases?

Regulatory Alignment: Mapping AI systems to the EU AI Act or NIST AI RMF. Pre-Deployment Review: Assessing risk before releasing a model or tool. Cross-Functional Collaboration: Legal, compliance, and AI teams jointly evaluating risk. Audit Trail: Documenting decisions and rationale for audits and regulators.

Will this tie into incident workflows?

Yes. Incidents involving AI system misuse or harm can trigger assessments. Likewise, risk findings can link back into Compliance or Privacy obligations when thresholds are met.

Can I see reporting by risk level or framework coverage?

Yes. Assessments will support: Risk distribution by system | Framework coverage dashboards | Gaps or missing documentation

Can AI Risk handle multiple systems or models at once?

Yes. Assessments are per system/model but the interface will support a portfolio-level view.

Is this built to scale with new regulations?

Yes. New frameworks, jurisdictions, or internal review processes can be added via configuration. We plan to provide prebuilt updates for major regulatory shifts post-GA.

How does AI Risk integrate with existing AI governance software?

Radar AI Risk connects seamlessly with other AI governance tools, enabling centralized oversight without the need to replace existing systems.

Can AI Risk support high level reporting for executives and boards?

Yes. The platform offers high level dashboards and scorecards designed for leadership to quickly assess organizational AI risk posture.

How does AI Risk help with training data compliance?

AI Risk tracks and documents training data quality, provenance, and use, ensuring compliance with privacy and ethical guidelines.

Is Radar AI Risk suitable for organizations just beginning to adopt AI?

Absolutely. Whether you are starting small or scaling enterprise-wide, Radar AI Risk provides the structure to manage compliance from the beginning of development and deployment.

Search Results | RadarFirst

To Err is Human – The Privacy Incident Benchmark Report 2021

The Privacy Incident Benchmark Report 2021 has arrived to help organizations improve operational efficiencies in incident response management.

7 Tips to Improve Collaboration

Collaboration between privacy, security, and compliance is essential in navigating the complexities of privacy regulations. Deborah Rimmler, counsel with Dentons Law Firm, shares 7 tips for improving collaboration to reduce risks to save the world from fragmented and inefficient methods.

Infographic: Trends in Changing Data Breach Notification Laws

Download the 2021 Trends in Changing Data Breach Notification Regulations eBook now > Explore Incident Response: The Pillar of Modern Privacy Management > Learn more about How Radar Works > changing privacy regulatory trends infographic RadarFirst

How to Reduce the Stress of Incident Response

From the moment privacy incidents occur the clock starts ticking. Here are 11 questions to ask to improve your risk assessment process and steps you can take to mature incident response management today.

Privacy Regulatory Trends: The Data Mapping Imperative

What can privacy teams learn from IT's use of data mapping? In this blog we explore an approach to collect data in a way that balances regulatory trends and maps regulated data across business networks.

How to Use Privacy Metrics for Program Improvement and to Prove ROI

How do you quantify the value of your privacy program? How do you use operational metrics to improve the efficiency of your program? Read now.

Regulatory Update: EU-U.S. Privacy Shield Invalid under Schrems II, 4 State Breach Notification Laws Take Effect

On July 16, the Court of Justice of the European Union issued its decision on the so-called “Schrems II” case, invalidating the European Commission’s adequacy decision for the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework.

Justifying Privacy Program Costs: From Story to Metrics to ROI

Showing ROI for privacy programs has never been more important. Maybe you’re seeking to justify purchasing tools to help handle fast-changing privacy laws and growing threats. Maybe, as a result of pandemic-induced cost-cutting issues, you’re having to re-justify tools and other investments, or maybe you are having to cost-justify the privacy program itself. But […]

Privacy Regulations Now: COVID, Civil Rights, and Compliance in Interesting Times

[…] epidemic exploded in March, businesses around the world faced an onslaught of change: working remotely, serving customers online, adopting new technologies to support remote work, and figuring out all the impacts on privacy policies and procedures. Three months later, the pace of change continues to accelerate, and it likely won’t slow down any time soon.

RadarFirst Launches Inaugural Privacy Incident Benchmarking Report

First-of-its-kind report provides the privacy, compliance, and security community with privacy incident benchmark data to drive operational excellence.

Quantifying the Value of a Privacy Program: Education, Metrics, Relationships

A discussion about how to prove the value of your privacy program internally using metrics and benchmarks. Read the blog now.

How to Tame the Chaos of Global Data Breach Notification Laws

When a privacy incident occurs, a company may have only hours to respond. Managing a timely response in compliance with global breach notification laws is never easy. These regulations quickly evolve and often conflict, creating a complex tangle that challenges privacy incident response teams at the best of times. Consistency and efficiency are key […]

Faster Time to Privacy Incident Decision: How to Accelerate Breach Notification Timeframes

This article is part of an ongoing series on privacy program metrics and benchmarking for incident response management, brought to you by RADAR. Read the original article on the IAPP Privacy Advisor. Have you ever picked up a rock to find hidden underneath a colony of industrious ants working away? By removing the rock, you […]

Preparing for the New Abnormal: Documenting HIPAA Compliance During COVID-19

What happens after the pandemic? In hindsight, will patients, regulators, and the public be forgiving of privacy decisions made by embattled healthcare organizations? How can healthcare providers protect themselves, in case communal memory proves short?

To Streamline Workflow, Remote Privacy Teams Focus on the Fundamentals

The COVID-19 pandemic has forced most privacy teams to disperse. The sudden shift to a remote workforce has also forced privacy professionals to rethink how they work and find leaner, better ways to get the job done.