Why did we build this product?

The rise of AI regulations globally (EU AI Act, U.S. Executive Order, state-level laws) is creating urgent demand for organizations to identify and manage their AI-related risks. Our customers need a way to evaluate their AI systems and ensure compliance across jurisdictions, frameworks, and internal policies, while also ensuring a defensible audit trail. AI Risk is our response to that need.

What problem is AI Risk solving?

AI Risk provides a structured and defensible assessment process to identify and document risks tied to the use of AI systems. It supports organizations in evaluating regulatory exposure, applying consistent risk frameworks, and establishing AI governance across legal, privacy, security, and compliance teams.

Who will use this product?

AI Risk is intended for cross-functional teams that include Compliance, Legal, AI Governance, and Risk Management. AI Steering committees and their component members. AI steering committees and executives responsible for AI governance risk and compliance will find this especially valuable.

What makes this different from other AI governance tools?

Unlike general-purpose risk registers or generic GRC tools, AI Risk: Codifies regulatory guidance (e.g., EU AI Act, NIST RMF) into configurable assessments. Supports multi-framework alignment and documentation. Provides built-in auditability and traceability.

What are the top use cases?

Regulatory Alignment: Mapping AI systems to the EU AI Act or NIST AI RMF. Pre-Deployment Review: Assessing risk before releasing a model or tool. Cross-Functional Collaboration: Legal, compliance, and AI teams jointly evaluating risk. Audit Trail: Documenting decisions and rationale for audits and regulators.

Will this tie into incident workflows?

Yes. Incidents involving AI system misuse or harm can trigger assessments. Likewise, risk findings can link back into Compliance or Privacy obligations when thresholds are met.

Can I see reporting by risk level or framework coverage?

Yes. Assessments will support: Risk distribution by system | Framework coverage dashboards | Gaps or missing documentation

Can AI Risk handle multiple systems or models at once?

Yes. Assessments are per system/model but the interface will support a portfolio-level view.

Is this built to scale with new regulations?

Yes. New frameworks, jurisdictions, or internal review processes can be added via configuration. We plan to provide prebuilt updates for major regulatory shifts post-GA.

How does AI Risk integrate with existing AI governance software?

Radar AI Risk connects seamlessly with other AI governance tools, enabling centralized oversight without the need to replace existing systems.

Can AI Risk support high level reporting for executives and boards?

Yes. The platform offers high level dashboards and scorecards designed for leadership to quickly assess organizational AI risk posture.

How does AI Risk help with training data compliance?

AI Risk tracks and documents training data quality, provenance, and use, ensuring compliance with privacy and ethical guidelines.

Is Radar AI Risk suitable for organizations just beginning to adopt AI?

Absolutely. Whether you are starting small or scaling enterprise-wide, Radar AI Risk provides the structure to manage compliance from the beginning of development and deployment.

Search Results | RadarFirst

Evaluate Your Privacy Incident Response Program: Introducing New Quarterly Benchmarking Metrics

[…] cut. I bring this up, not because I want to broadcast my lifelong aspirations to play professional soccer, but as an example for something I see in privacy programs. When it comes to incident response management, there are no established rankings of who is doing well or who does poorly. Privacy professionals operate, in […]

On Our Radar: October 24, 2019

[…] gone by, and with it another news cycle filled with examples of recent data breaches, hacking attacks, and regulatory enforcements. Does it feel like our work as privacy professionals is enjoying a little too much of the limelight these days? You aren’t alone. Data breaches – and the required notification to affected individuals – […]

Built to Win: 5 Steps of a Proactive Incident Response Plan that Works

Privacy and security incidents involving sensitive personal data are as individual as fingerprints. An incident involving misplaced paper records is vastly different from a large-scale cyber-attack affecting millions of people. Yet the organization with the paper incident and the organization with the cyber-attack are both subject to a complex web of global data breach notification […]

Changing Data Breach Laws: The New York SHIELD Act

[…] to HHS under HIPAA. Notification Contents Specified: Individual notification contents are newly specified. Read the full text of the regulation here. What does this mean for privacy professionals? Under the new provision, a failure to report a breach under HIPAA could also lead to a failure to report to the New York Attorney […]

On Our Radar: October 11, 2019

It probably isn’t often that the world of privacy professionals is likened to a soap opera. However, if you really think about it, is the privacy world really all that far off from this genre of daytime television? The melodrama. The suspense. The evil twins! Ok, forget that last one. But there has been […]

Incident response ROI: Benchmarking data to secure budget, prove value

[…] initially can highlight results you may find risky and unacceptable. Ultimately it’s not really a question of whether it’s worth it to measure and invest in your privacy program, but rather a question of whether you can afford not to. You can’t change without a baseline and a benchmark for success. The ROI of […]

On Our Radar: October 4, 2019

[…] talk a lot about the different data breach notification laws proposed and enacted at a global level, and how that can contribute to a patchwork of complex privacy regulations that can leave privacy professionals scratching their heads. One of the trending regulatory changes we’re seeing in US states that will impact the insurance industry […]

The CISO’s Guide to Mitigating Enterprise Risk with Privacy by Design

[…] One of the most significant impacts on today’s CISOs, however, has nothing to do with mobile devices, malware, or the Internet of Things (IoT). Instead, expansive new privacy laws such as the European Union’s GDPR, California’s CCPA, and Canada’s PIPEDA often shape how a CISO sets priorities. Failure to comply with these laws poses […]

On Our Radar: September 27, 2019

[…] books. First, we have officially launched our new name and branding – RADAR, LLC is now RadarFirst. And secondly, I had the pleasure of attending the IAPP Privacy. Security. Risk. conference in Las Vegas and meeting face to face with privacy professionals from around the world. I’ve written before that my inspiration for Radar […]

On Our Radar: September 20, 2019

[…] week’s installment of On Our Radar my colleague Greg discussed the data breaches and security incidents that threaten the healthcare industry, including the unique challenges for healthcare privacy professionals. This week, I wanted to take the same approach diving into another industry that is heavily regulated and is charged with protecting sensitive personal information: […]

Preview: 5 Can’t-miss sessions at IAPP P.S.R.

The 2019 IAPP Privacy. Risk. Security. conference is only a few days away, and there will be a lot to discuss as leading minds in the privacy field gather in Las Vegas to establish and share best practices. This event is also a great environment for identifying the hottest trends and topics in Privacy. […]

On Our Radar: July 12, 2019

[…] catching up on what you’ve missed, getting back into the work mindset, and reading through a pile of emails in your inbox. And that’s the thing about privacy – it doesn’t sleep, it doesn’t take a long weekend. This week in privacy news exemplified this. Below are two of the bigger stories we’re talking […]

Breach Notification Regulatory Trends from 2018

[…] been more critical—and never more difficult. This article is the first in a series discussing the regulatory trends over the past year, and what they mean for privacy professionals who must continually adjust what compliance looks like under state, federal, and international laws. Keeping up with these constantly changing regulations requires a privacy team […]

Tackling the Top 4 Challenges of Managing Privacy Incident Response

Wherever data goes, risk follows close behind, particularly the risk of unauthorized access and disclosure—in other words, a data privacy or security incident. Every organization, regardless of size or industry, has (and will) experienced their share of privacy incidents. Given that, how can teams address the top 4 difficulties in managing privacy incident response […]

Protenus and RADAR Partner to Mitigate Security and Privacy Risks for Healthcare Organizations

Leading healthcare compliance analytics company and top incident response management company partner to provide technology for security and privacy incident detection and risk assessment, ensuring compliance with HIPAA and U.S. state breach notification requirements. BALTIMORE, MD — January 7, 2019 — Protenus, a healthcare compliance analytics platform that protects patient privacy for the nation’s […]