Why did we build this product?

The rise of AI regulations globally (EU AI Act, U.S. Executive Order, state-level laws) is creating urgent demand for organizations to identify and manage their AI-related risks. Our customers need a way to evaluate their AI systems and ensure compliance across jurisdictions, frameworks, and internal policies, while also ensuring a defensible audit trail. AI Risk is our response to that need.

What problem is AI Risk solving?

AI Risk provides a structured and defensible assessment process to identify and document risks tied to the use of AI systems. It supports organizations in evaluating regulatory exposure, applying consistent risk frameworks, and establishing AI governance across legal, privacy, security, and compliance teams.

Who will use this product?

AI Risk is intended for cross-functional teams that include Compliance, Legal, AI Governance, and Risk Management. AI Steering committees and their component members. AI steering committees and executives responsible for AI governance risk and compliance will find this especially valuable.

What makes this different from other AI governance tools?

Unlike general-purpose risk registers or generic GRC tools, AI Risk: Codifies regulatory guidance (e.g., EU AI Act, NIST RMF) into configurable assessments. Supports multi-framework alignment and documentation. Provides built-in auditability and traceability.

What are the top use cases?

Regulatory Alignment: Mapping AI systems to the EU AI Act or NIST AI RMF. Pre-Deployment Review: Assessing risk before releasing a model or tool. Cross-Functional Collaboration: Legal, compliance, and AI teams jointly evaluating risk. Audit Trail: Documenting decisions and rationale for audits and regulators.

Will this tie into incident workflows?

Yes. Incidents involving AI system misuse or harm can trigger assessments. Likewise, risk findings can link back into Compliance or Privacy obligations when thresholds are met.

Can I see reporting by risk level or framework coverage?

Yes. Assessments will support: Risk distribution by system | Framework coverage dashboards | Gaps or missing documentation

Can AI Risk handle multiple systems or models at once?

Yes. Assessments are per system/model but the interface will support a portfolio-level view.

Is this built to scale with new regulations?

Yes. New frameworks, jurisdictions, or internal review processes can be added via configuration. We plan to provide prebuilt updates for major regulatory shifts post-GA.

How does AI Risk integrate with existing AI governance software?

Radar AI Risk connects seamlessly with other AI governance tools, enabling centralized oversight without the need to replace existing systems.

Can AI Risk support high level reporting for executives and boards?

Yes. The platform offers high level dashboards and scorecards designed for leadership to quickly assess organizational AI risk posture.

How does AI Risk help with training data compliance?

AI Risk tracks and documents training data quality, provenance, and use, ensuring compliance with privacy and ethical guidelines.

Is Radar AI Risk suitable for organizations just beginning to adopt AI?

Absolutely. Whether you are starting small or scaling enterprise-wide, Radar AI Risk provides the structure to manage compliance from the beginning of development and deployment.

Search Results | RadarFirst

Quantifying the Value of a Privacy Program: Education, Metrics, Relationships

A discussion about how to prove the value of your privacy program internally using metrics and benchmarks. Read the blog now.

How to Tame the Chaos of Global Data Breach Notification Laws

When a privacy incident occurs, a company may have only hours to respond. Managing a timely response in compliance with global breach notification laws is never easy. These regulations quickly evolve and often conflict, creating a complex tangle that challenges privacy incident response teams at the best of times. Consistency and efficiency are key […]

rosemary morgan patricia thompson radarfirst the privacy collective

Quantifying the Value of a Privacy Program

In this session we cover why it’s critical to educate stakeholders and decision-makers on what privacy programs do. Watch now.

Faster Time to Privacy Incident Decision: How to Accelerate Breach Notification Timeframes

This article is part of an ongoing series on privacy program metrics and benchmarking for incident response management, brought to you by RADAR. Read the original article on the IAPP Privacy Advisor. Have you ever picked up a rock to find hidden underneath a colony of industrious ants working away? By removing the rock, you […]

Preparing for the New Abnormal: Documenting HIPAA Compliance During COVID-19

What happens after the pandemic? In hindsight, will patients, regulators, and the public be forgiving of privacy decisions made by embattled healthcare organizations? How can healthcare providers protect themselves, in case communal memory proves short?

To Streamline Workflow, Remote Privacy Teams Focus on the Fundamentals

The COVID-19 pandemic has forced most privacy teams to disperse. The sudden shift to a remote workforce has also forced privacy professionals to rethink how they work and find leaner, better ways to get the job done.

tim smith radarfirst the privacy collective

Privacy Collaboration & Streamlined Workflow

In this session we discuss collaboration across the privacy team and how to best streamline workflow as teams face new challenges. Watch now.

Privacy vs. Public Health: Compliance and Reporting During COVID-19

Addressing questions on OCR announcements regarding the release of health information to first responders and privacy requirements in community-based COVID testing sites.

Successful Privacy Protection is Powered by Collaboration

Cross-functional collaboration on privacy issues is challenging at the best of times, and even more so now, as the coronavirus pandemic has workforces scattered, from essential operations centers to home offices.

Privacy and the Remote Office in the Time of COVID-19

With the fast-moving COVID-19 pandemic, the privacy “attack surface” has grown to include countless home offices and kitchen tables. And the challenge of coordinating privacy incident response has grown exponentially.

HIPAA Breach Notification Rule: A Baseline for Healthcare Incident Response in Uncertain Times

[…] of COVID-19 patients are at risk of falling ill themselves. In this time of crisis, healthcare organizations are also at risk for an unprecedented number of data privacy and security incidents. Understanding the HIPAA Breach Notification Rule is key in these uncertain times. Last month, a cyber-attack hit the U.S. Department of Health & […]

How to Slash Time Spent Addressing Contractual Obligations

Automating privacy incident response boosts efficiency, provides scalability, and slashes time spent assessing contractual obligations.

Privacy Thoughts for Challenging Times

We are all working together to flatten the curve in the midst of the coronavirus pandemic, and the privacy community has pivoted to sharing ideas virtually instead of live.

CCPA vs. California Breach Notification Law: What’s the Difference?

Now that spring is here, the July 1 enforcement date for the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) is closing in. Companies covered under the CCPA, therefore, only have a short time to get ready before enforcement kicks in. However, for many organizations—especially in ad tech—confusion has been the name of the game. Two big […]

How to Use 2020 to Improve Your Privacy Incident Response

Review key privacy incident response metrics and see how your company compares with established industry benchmarks.