Why did we build this product?

The rise of AI regulations globally (EU AI Act, U.S. Executive Order, state-level laws) is creating urgent demand for organizations to identify and manage their AI-related risks. Our customers need a way to evaluate their AI systems and ensure compliance across jurisdictions, frameworks, and internal policies, while also ensuring a defensible audit trail. AI Risk is our response to that need.

What problem is AI Risk solving?

AI Risk provides a structured and defensible assessment process to identify and document risks tied to the use of AI systems. It supports organizations in evaluating regulatory exposure, applying consistent risk frameworks, and establishing AI governance across legal, privacy, security, and compliance teams.

Who will use this product?

AI Risk is intended for cross-functional teams that include Compliance, Legal, AI Governance, and Risk Management. AI Steering committees and their component members. AI steering committees and executives responsible for AI governance risk and compliance will find this especially valuable.

What makes this different from other AI governance tools?

Unlike general-purpose risk registers or generic GRC tools, AI Risk: Codifies regulatory guidance (e.g., EU AI Act, NIST RMF) into configurable assessments. Supports multi-framework alignment and documentation. Provides built-in auditability and traceability.

What are the top use cases?

Regulatory Alignment: Mapping AI systems to the EU AI Act or NIST AI RMF. Pre-Deployment Review: Assessing risk before releasing a model or tool. Cross-Functional Collaboration: Legal, compliance, and AI teams jointly evaluating risk. Audit Trail: Documenting decisions and rationale for audits and regulators.

Will this tie into incident workflows?

Yes. Incidents involving AI system misuse or harm can trigger assessments. Likewise, risk findings can link back into Compliance or Privacy obligations when thresholds are met.

Can I see reporting by risk level or framework coverage?

Yes. Assessments will support: Risk distribution by system | Framework coverage dashboards | Gaps or missing documentation

Can AI Risk handle multiple systems or models at once?

Yes. Assessments are per system/model but the interface will support a portfolio-level view.

Is this built to scale with new regulations?

Yes. New frameworks, jurisdictions, or internal review processes can be added via configuration. We plan to provide prebuilt updates for major regulatory shifts post-GA.

How does AI Risk integrate with existing AI governance software?

Radar AI Risk connects seamlessly with other AI governance tools, enabling centralized oversight without the need to replace existing systems.

Can AI Risk support high level reporting for executives and boards?

Yes. The platform offers high level dashboards and scorecards designed for leadership to quickly assess organizational AI risk posture.

How does AI Risk help with training data compliance?

AI Risk tracks and documents training data quality, provenance, and use, ensuring compliance with privacy and ethical guidelines.

Is Radar AI Risk suitable for organizations just beginning to adopt AI?

Absolutely. Whether you are starting small or scaling enterprise-wide, Radar AI Risk provides the structure to manage compliance from the beginning of development and deployment.

Search Results | RadarFirst

TrustArc and RADAR, Inc. Partner to Power Comprehensive Privacy Solutions to Manage Global Compliance Requirements

Partnership provides businesses with access to innovative privacy tech solutions to operationalize compliance with data privacy and breach notification regulations, including the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) SAN FRANCISCO and BERLIN — May 16, 2018 —TrustArc, the leading data privacy management company, and RADAR Inc., the award-winning incident response management software, today announced […]

Benchmarking Incident Response: The State (or States) of Privacy Incidents

This article is part of an ongoing IAPP Privacy Advisor series on privacy program metrics and benchmarking for incident response management. Find earlier installments of this series here. When you experience an incident that involves regulated data, many questions come to mind. How was the data compromised? Has the incident been contained and risk mitigated? […]

Takeaways from the 22nd Annual HCCA Compliance Institute: Complexity and Change in Federal and State Compliance Efforts

Last week saw a great migration of healthcare compliance, privacy, and risk officers to sunny Las Vegas for the annual HCCA Compliance Institute. Wandering the halls of the event, you were likely to overhear people on their phones between sessions, urgently relaying what they’d just learned to their teams back home. This need to […]

RADAR wins 2017 HPE-IAPP Innovation Award for Privacy Technology at P.S.R

This news article was originally published by the IAPP. The evolution of the privacy field has seen a swift reaction from software companies, all eager to find new ways and methods of lessening the burden of compliance and privacy regulation for privacy professionals. Each year, HPE and the IAPP recognizes an organization that provides a […]

RADAR, Inc. Awarded Prestigious HPE-IAPP Privacy Innovation Award

The International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP) recognizes RADAR, Inc. for its innovative platform for simplifying compliance with data breach laws. PORTLAND, Ore. — October 17, 2017 — RADAR, Inc., the award-winning privacy and security incident response management software provider, announced today that it was awarded the HPE-IAPP Privacy Innovation Award. The HPE-IAPP Privacy […]

Lions and Tigers and SOC 2—Oh My! Tips for Navigating the SOC 2 Process

At RADAR, we understand how critical it is to keep sensitive information secure. Our clients use RADAR to manage privacy incidents involving Personally Identifiable Information (PII) and Protected Health Information (PHI), and we support this work by following best practices and industry standards for application, network, and infrastructure security. Next week at the IAPP […]

RADAR, Inc. Announces Second Patent Issued in Managing Contractual Notification Obligations; Fourth Patent Overall

[…] unique technology platform provides a single platform to efficiently manage regulatory and contractual incident response obligations. PORTLAND, Ore., — October 13, 2017 — RADAR, Inc., the award-winning privacy and security incident response management software provider, announced today the issuance of its latest patent expanding the scope of innovation of its technology for managing contractual […]

RADAR, Inc. Awarded Portland Business Journal Small Business Innovation Award 2017

[…] Journal award recognizes RADAR, Inc. for innovation, design, industry impact, and revenue growth. PORTLAND, Ore., — October 12, 2017 – RADAR, Inc., a SaaS solution provider of privacy and security incident response management, announced today that it has been selected as one of the recipients of the Portland Business Journal’s 2017 Small Business Innovation Awards. This […]

Questions to Ask when Considering SaaS vs On-Premise Solutions for Privacy Incident Response

[…] security. This kind of focus and expertise is very difficult to replicate in your company’s own IT or data center offering. Catch Andrew’s upcoming session at IAPP’s Privacy. Security. Risk. 2017: SOC2 Certification: How We Got There and What We’ve Learned. Read more… However, a SaaS vendor does have a shared security responsibility with both […]

From Incident to Discovery to Breach Notification: Average Time Frames

This article by Mahmood Sher-Jan is the fourth in a series of articles published with the IAPP Privacy Advisor, on the topic of establishing program metrics and benchmarking your privacy incident management program. Find earlier installments of this series here. Measuring the efficacy of your privacy program is one way to ensure you have […]

Can’t-Miss Sessions at IAPP Privacy. Security. Risk. 2017

Privacy and security teams are often painted as adversaries in compliance. While it’s true that privacy, security, and risk professionals often come from different backgrounds and interests, they are united in their shared pursuit of compliance and events like the IAPP Privacy. Security. Risk. 2017 illustrate the way these fields are converging. The schedule for this […]

Alliance of Global Privacy Solutions Providers: Bringing Technology and Innovative Solutions to GDPR Compliance

Privacy professionals across the globe all have the same date circled in their day planners in May of 2018. The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) enforcement deadline is fast approaching, and the risk of noncompliance are very real: failure to meet the 72 hour notification timeline could result in fines up to […]

Lesson from the Equifax Breach: Readiness is Priceless

[…] business partners, especially with a company like Equifax, which works with more than 91 million businesses worldwide. Complexity is Not an Excuse Timely response to a data privacy/security incident is critical to business: not only can slow response result in fines for noncompliance, delay also creates a negative impression with regulators, lawmakers, and the […]

Workflows and Checklists Can’t Match Automation in Privacy Incident Response

Performing a multi-factor risk assessment to determine whether an incident involving PII and/or PHI requires notification to regulatory bodies isn’t just a good practice for privacy programs–it’s a requirement for documenting and demonstrating compliance with data breach laws. Due to the misconception that any incident involving sensitive, regulated data is automatically a notifiable breach, […]

Upcoming Webinar: GDPR and Incident Response

[…] – 4:00 p.m. UTC Join panelists Claude-Etienne Armingaud, Partner at K&L Gates LLC, and Mahmood Sher-Jan, CEO of RADAR, Inc., for this educational webinar with the International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP). Key takeaways will include: Understand the key differences and similarities between U.S. and EU data breach regulatory frameworks including data transfer and storage requirements. […]