Why did we build this product?

The rise of AI regulations globally (EU AI Act, U.S. Executive Order, state-level laws) is creating urgent demand for organizations to identify and manage their AI-related risks. Our customers need a way to evaluate their AI systems and ensure compliance across jurisdictions, frameworks, and internal policies, while also ensuring a defensible audit trail. AI Risk is our response to that need.

What problem is AI Risk solving?

AI Risk provides a structured and defensible assessment process to identify and document risks tied to the use of AI systems. It supports organizations in evaluating regulatory exposure, applying consistent risk frameworks, and establishing AI governance across legal, privacy, security, and compliance teams.

Who will use this product?

AI Risk is intended for cross-functional teams that include Compliance, Legal, AI Governance, and Risk Management. AI Steering committees and their component members. AI steering committees and executives responsible for AI governance risk and compliance will find this especially valuable.

What makes this different from other AI governance tools?

Unlike general-purpose risk registers or generic GRC tools, AI Risk: Codifies regulatory guidance (e.g., EU AI Act, NIST RMF) into configurable assessments. Supports multi-framework alignment and documentation. Provides built-in auditability and traceability.

What are the top use cases?

Regulatory Alignment: Mapping AI systems to the EU AI Act or NIST AI RMF. Pre-Deployment Review: Assessing risk before releasing a model or tool. Cross-Functional Collaboration: Legal, compliance, and AI teams jointly evaluating risk. Audit Trail: Documenting decisions and rationale for audits and regulators.

Will this tie into incident workflows?

Yes. Incidents involving AI system misuse or harm can trigger assessments. Likewise, risk findings can link back into Compliance or Privacy obligations when thresholds are met.

Can I see reporting by risk level or framework coverage?

Yes. Assessments will support: Risk distribution by system | Framework coverage dashboards | Gaps or missing documentation

Can AI Risk handle multiple systems or models at once?

Yes. Assessments are per system/model but the interface will support a portfolio-level view.

Is this built to scale with new regulations?

Yes. New frameworks, jurisdictions, or internal review processes can be added via configuration. We plan to provide prebuilt updates for major regulatory shifts post-GA.

How does AI Risk integrate with existing AI governance software?

Radar AI Risk connects seamlessly with other AI governance tools, enabling centralized oversight without the need to replace existing systems.

Can AI Risk support high level reporting for executives and boards?

Yes. The platform offers high level dashboards and scorecards designed for leadership to quickly assess organizational AI risk posture.

How does AI Risk help with training data compliance?

AI Risk tracks and documents training data quality, provenance, and use, ensuring compliance with privacy and ethical guidelines.

Is Radar AI Risk suitable for organizations just beginning to adopt AI?

Absolutely. Whether you are starting small or scaling enterprise-wide, Radar AI Risk provides the structure to manage compliance from the beginning of development and deployment.

Search Results | RadarFirst

Radar Privacy Decision Support Platform for Legal and Privacy Professionals

[…] SaaS based decision support solution specifically designed to provide legal and privacy professionals efficient and consistent incident risk assessments in order to make timely notification decisions for compliance with complex and changing international and U.S. (federal and state) data breach laws. Radar® Privacy serves as an operational infrastructure for managing the lifecycle of data […]

The Privacy Collective | Digital Transformation: Solving for Privacy’s Evolving Fingerprint

[…] Search Results When: October 6th at 10:00am PT / 1:00pm ET (3o mins) Join us for a live Q&A with James Van Beek, VP of Regulatory and Program Compliance at American Speciality Health, Katelyn Johnston, Privacy Office Manager of Regulatory Strategic Development at American Specialty Health, and Shari Kenney, Strategic Account Manager at RadarFirst, for a discussion […]

Recapping Our Biggest Event of 2022: RadarFirst Privacy Summit

[…] at RadarFirst, led a panel discussion with special guests Richard Chapman, CPO at University of Kentucky Healthcare, Laura Rieben, CPO at Independence BCBS, and Nancy Sweeney, Senior Compliance Analyst II at Pacific Life, on leveraging RadarFirst for superior incident response. The panel discussion was broken into three different topics, highlighting specific stages of the […]

The Compliance Trifecta: Privacy, Security, and Legal

[…] business process when it comes to organizational structure and poor inter-departmental coordination. How privacy, security, and legal departments converge and collaborate to protect data and ensure regulatory compliance could mean the difference between a strong culture of compliance and a data breach disaster. Building a Collaborative Incident Response Process Starts with Knowing Your Org […]

first public ccpa enforcement fines sephora $1.2 million

First Public CCPA Enforcement Sends a Strong Message to Retailers

[…] The Clock is Ticking As part of ongoing efforts to enforce CCPA, Attorney General Bonta sent notices earlier this week to a number of businesses alleging non- compliance relating to their failure to process consumer opt-out requests. Businesses that received letters have 30 days to cure the alleged violations or face enforcement action. The […]

NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law Guide Preview

A Comprehensive Guide to the NAIC Model Law

[…] the laws include the following differences: “Nuances within NAIC Model Law adoptions mean that insurance licensees will find it challenging to apply a simple, uniform set-it and-forget-it compliance policy. It also means that automation of privacy incident risk assessment could be considered a basic business necessity to maintain compliance with evolving laws.” –Lauren Wallace, […]

Understanding the NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law

[…] above, whether and in what circumstances consumers must be notified. Data points such as state, effective date, and notification window are only three of 18 categories of compliance the Radar® Privacy automated platform tracks and uses to determine incident risk. Unlike other state laws, Vermont’s H.515 does not impose notification obligations on licensees following […]

Radar® Breach Guidance Engine Datasheet Thumbnail

Radar® Breach Guidance Engine: Always Compliant

[…] federal level. This year promises new NAIC laws across various U.S. states and regulations which will complicate the amount of time organizations spend researching regulations to meet compliance requirements. Recognizing that manual processes won’t be sufficient to manage the impact of changing regulations, leaders should adopt incident response processes that support increasing volume, variety, […]

Radar Privacy and the California Consumer Privacy Act

Learn how Radar Privacy provides consistent incident risk scoring for CCPA compliance. Read, download, and share the datasheet here.

GDPR Ready with Radar Privacy

See how Radar Privacy's patented breach guidance/notification software simplifies GDPR compliance. Read, download, and share the datasheet here.

Closing the loop on incident response thumbnail

Closing the Loop on Incident Response with Radar Privacy

[…] and services designed to protect and manage sensitive corporate data. A well-developed privacy and security governance program includes the use of tools such as: Governance, Risk, and Compliance Platforms (GRC): providing content management, workflow management, reporting and relational data models. Security Information and Event Management Solutions (SIEM) or Managed Security Service Providers (MSSP): providing […]

The ROI of Operational Efficiency in Privacy Incident Management

[…] & Cost “As much as an 80-90% reduction in time spent on assessments; could take 3-4 hours per state before and now takes just minutes.” — Privacy Compliance Officer Reduce time spent on incident assessment Radar® Privacy provides automated decision-support guidance, leading users through a consistent, intuitive process for investigating, profiling and scoring data […]

too much or too little? reporting data breaches accurately with RadarFirst

Too Much or Too Little? The Risks of Under- or Over-Reporting Data Breaches

[…] be risk assessed to determine if they are breaches requiring notification. At the heart of every risk assessment is a mosaic of always-changing, ever-increasing breach notification obligations. Compliance is always a moving target, as the following list demonstrates: All 50 states have breach notification laws, plus the District of Columbia, Guam, Puerto Rico, and […]

Radar® Privacy - Security and Privacy Incident Management Datasheet Thumbnail

Security & Privacy Incident Management

[…] The RadarFirst Breach Guidance Engine™ leads users through an intuitive workflow that profiles and scores data privacy and security incidents and generates incident-specific notification guidelines to meet compliance and quickly resolve incidents. Radar® Privacy Integration with Security Platforms Radar® Privacy features an integration with ServiceNow that provides a closed-loop solution for privacy and security […]

GRC and Radar Privacy Integration

Datasheet GRC and Radar Privacy Integration Complementary Solutions for Managing the Incident Response Lifecycle Download PDF GRC applications address enterprise-level governance, risk and compliance issues. Despite their wide range of features and functionality, they lack the ability to deliver automation and decision support guidance for incident response management relative to data breach notification laws. […]