Why did we build this product?

The rise of AI regulations globally (EU AI Act, U.S. Executive Order, state-level laws) is creating urgent demand for organizations to identify and manage their AI-related risks. Our customers need a way to evaluate their AI systems and ensure compliance across jurisdictions, frameworks, and internal policies, while also ensuring a defensible audit trail. AI Risk is our response to that need.

What problem is AI Risk solving?

AI Risk provides a structured and defensible assessment process to identify and document risks tied to the use of AI systems. It supports organizations in evaluating regulatory exposure, applying consistent risk frameworks, and establishing AI governance across legal, privacy, security, and compliance teams.

Who will use this product?

AI Risk is intended for cross-functional teams that include Compliance, Legal, AI Governance, and Risk Management. AI Steering committees and their component members. AI steering committees and executives responsible for AI governance risk and compliance will find this especially valuable.

What makes this different from other AI governance tools?

Unlike general-purpose risk registers or generic GRC tools, AI Risk: Codifies regulatory guidance (e.g., EU AI Act, NIST RMF) into configurable assessments. Supports multi-framework alignment and documentation. Provides built-in auditability and traceability.

What are the top use cases?

Regulatory Alignment: Mapping AI systems to the EU AI Act or NIST AI RMF. Pre-Deployment Review: Assessing risk before releasing a model or tool. Cross-Functional Collaboration: Legal, compliance, and AI teams jointly evaluating risk. Audit Trail: Documenting decisions and rationale for audits and regulators.

Will this tie into incident workflows?

Yes. Incidents involving AI system misuse or harm can trigger assessments. Likewise, risk findings can link back into Compliance or Privacy obligations when thresholds are met.

Can I see reporting by risk level or framework coverage?

Yes. Assessments will support: Risk distribution by system | Framework coverage dashboards | Gaps or missing documentation

Can AI Risk handle multiple systems or models at once?

Yes. Assessments are per system/model but the interface will support a portfolio-level view.

Is this built to scale with new regulations?

Yes. New frameworks, jurisdictions, or internal review processes can be added via configuration. We plan to provide prebuilt updates for major regulatory shifts post-GA.

How does AI Risk integrate with existing AI governance software?

Radar AI Risk connects seamlessly with other AI governance tools, enabling centralized oversight without the need to replace existing systems.

Can AI Risk support high level reporting for executives and boards?

Yes. The platform offers high level dashboards and scorecards designed for leadership to quickly assess organizational AI risk posture.

How does AI Risk help with training data compliance?

AI Risk tracks and documents training data quality, provenance, and use, ensuring compliance with privacy and ethical guidelines.

Is Radar AI Risk suitable for organizations just beginning to adopt AI?

Absolutely. Whether you are starting small or scaling enterprise-wide, Radar AI Risk provides the structure to manage compliance from the beginning of development and deployment.

Search Results | RadarFirst

Scaling a Privacy Program for the Future

[…] the on-demand discussion here. The merger between SunTrust and BB&T has made Truist the sixth-largest bank in the country. As the manager of Truist’s privacy and technology compliance programs, Whitworth discusses the importance of prioritizing privacy and incident management during a merger. In our discussion, Whitworth advocates for putting clients – and their privacy […]

Changes to California Breach Notification Laws

[…] have made clear that putting security measures in place only after a breach occurs will indicate that the company did not act in good faith. Getting into compliance with CPRA can not be left to chance or manual effort after the fact. Now more than ever, digital transformation of your privacy and breach response […]

FCC Proposes Stricter Data Breach Reporting Requirements to Protect CPNI

What is CPNI? CPNI includes customer data collected by telecommunications providers, including what services subscribers use and the amount and type of usage. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is proposing stricter reporting requirements for telecomm. companies to better protect CPNI and maintain CPNI compliance. Learn more in the blog.

Digital Transformation in Privacy: Think Big, Start Small

[…] to discuss how to get started with the digital transformation journey. In this informative session, Maciel and Sikes outlined why digital transformation is vital for privacy and compliance teams, offered up best practices, common pitfalls, and tips, because as Sikes states, “The pace is not going to slow down and let the world catch […]

7 Steps to Get Started with Digital Transformation for Privacy

“When you work in the compliance and risk management space, we often view digital transformation as something that happens to us and not necessarily for us.” -Victor Maciel Wherever you are on the journey to more digitized solutions and automation, the latest session of The Privacy Collective, Privacy in a Transforming (Digital) World, provides […]

demystifying digital transformation iapp webinar radarfirst

Demystifying Digital Transformation in Privacy

Learn why it's important to embrace digital transformation within Privacy and Compliance programs in this free IAPP webinar. Watch here.

Move over HIPAA–Say Hello to GIPA

[…] teeth they will need to move forward with privacy law enforcement measures. Transforming with the times As new and evolving data privacy laws stack up, staying in compliance with breach notification laws doesn’t have to be a challenge. Leverage the intelligent incident management platform to up-level your privacy program today. I’m ready to Transform […]

Privacy in a Transforming (Digital) World

In this session we cover digital transformation initiatives and their impact on privacy and compliance teams. Watch now.

Digital Transformation Actualized with Automated Incident Response

[…] efficiencies. Whatever your focus, it’s imperative to include measurable goals – or sets of benchmarks – to align your direction with a desired outcome. For Privacy and Compliance teams focused on improvements to data incident management processes, it can be helpful to specifically compare outcomes with industry peers. RadarFirst’s incident response benchmarking data helps […]

11 Privacy Regulatory Enforcement Trends

[…] Privacy Collective, Kelly Matoney, executive director of privacy at Vista Consulting Group, talks with Lauren Wallace, RadarFirst’s chief privacy officer and general counsel. Matoney’s background in privacy compliance, risk management, and data governance and her experience as a licensed attorney — spanning Amazon, PWS, Iron Mountain, the Federal Aviation Administration, and the U.S. Department […]

RadarFirst Unveils New Solution to Unify Privacy Incident Management Across Teams

RadarFirst, the industry-leader recognized for its patented intelligent privacy incident management platform, announced today the launch of Incident Dimensions™, a new solution that expedites incident resolution and enables collaboration across incident response teams, including: Security, Compliance, Records Management, Privacy, and others.

Is it Time to Embrace Technology to Improve Efficiencies?

[…] focus on their work rather than struggling with how to work,” states Fuchs. No organization has time for inefficiencies, especially when working in a highly-regulated environment where compliance is key. With data breach notification laws in flux, efficiency is critical. Maybe it’s time to operationalize your organization? Across industries, technology can dramatically improve efficiency […]

Reduce Incident Notification with Data Redaction

[…] To best reduce time and resources spent on privacy incident management, effective risk assessment must be: consistent, objective, timely, and defensible. The repeatability of the process ensures compliance in a complex and changing regulatory landscape. The above timeline depicts data from the 2021 Baker Hostetler data security incident response report, which found the average […]

Trends in Privacy Regulatory Enforcement in 2021

[…] lags US enforcement patterns emerge from patchwork of Federal and state laws State laws present a pathway to class-action lawsuits against Big Tech Read more below. GDPR Compliance Enforcement Lags, While State Laws in the US Differ on the Right of Private Citizens to Seek Damages Our recent blog about the EU’s General Data […]

Reducing Incident Response by 80% Isn’t Magic, It’s RadarFirst

[…] Closed 70% of privacy-related incident investigations within 48-72 hours RadarFirst’s incident response management software is trusted by organizations in heavily regulated industries to reduce risk and simplify compliance with U.S. and international data breach laws. While Radar doesn’t wash towels and sheets, it does reduce risk while reducing incident response time and meeting the […]